[ SECRET POST #382 ]

[shahni.livejournal.com]

⌈ Secret Post #382 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.


__________________________________________________



2.
__________________________________________________



3.
__________________________________________________



4.
__________________________________________________



5.
__________________________________________________



6.
__________________________________________________



7.
__________________________________________________



8.
__________________________________________________



9.
__________________________________________________



10.
__________________________________________________



11.
__________________________________________________



12.
__________________________________________________



13.
__________________________________________________



14.
__________________________________________________



15.
__________________________________________________



16.
__________________________________________________



17.
__________________________________________________



18.
__________________________________________________



19.
__________________________________________________



20.
__________________________________________________



21.
__________________________________________________



22.
__________________________________________________



23.
__________________________________________________



24.
__________________________________________________



25.
__________________________________________________



26.
__________________________________________________



27.
__________________________________________________



28.
__________________________________________________



29.
__________________________________________________



30.
__________________________________________________



31.
__________________________________________________



32.
__________________________________________________



33.
__________________________________________________



34.
__________________________________________________



35.
__________________________________________________



36.
__________________________________________________



37.
__________________________________________________



38.
__________________________________________________



39.
__________________________________________________



40.
__________________________________________________



41.
__________________________________________________



42.
__________________________________________________



43.
__________________________________________________



44.
__________________________________________________



45.
__________________________________________________



46.
__________________________________________________



47.
__________________________________________________



48.
__________________________________________________



49.
__________________________________________________






Notes:

- Thank you to Ghostie for help on making this on time!
- Name that fandom, first comment!

Secrets Left to Post: 08 pages, 150 secrets from Secret Submission Post #055.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 ] too big
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008.
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[hezul.livejournal.com]

I would classify them as tropes, not cliches, myself. :X

[forchancookie.livejournal.com]

It seems like a more PC way of saying cliche to me ^_^;;

[hezul.livejournal.com]

Mm, not exactly. To borrow a quote from the TV Tropes wiki:

"Tropes are devices and conventions that a writer can reasonably rely on as being present in the audience members' minds and expectations. If a trope gets used too much, then it becomes clichéd. The word cliché means stereotyped and trite. In other words, dull and uninteresting."

I don't think those elements of storytelling are in themselves dull and uninteresting so much as they become so when poorly written.

[forchancookie.livejournal.com]

That really seems like splitting hairs though, because one person doesn't think it's overdone they want to be nice and call it a trope or a staple while someone else will scream if they see such a thing one more time because it's cliche for them. I think it's all a matter of personal tastes which side of the fence you want to pop up on. I never said that people couldn't enjoy cliches. It would be hard to watch anime if you couldn't deal with them and I watch a lot of anime despite it...though I do stop watching a few when they drag out the more tired and boring cliches. Enough cute little orphan eps ok! ^_^;;

[trinities.livejournal.com]

So I'm guessing you can't dig on a lot of Victorian Lit?

What you're bashing is actually literary tropes, things that people go to college and get degrees from examining. If you can't understand that some of these traditions are a part of media ...

[forchancookie.livejournal.com]

Who's bashing here? A difference of opinion is not bashing, it's a difference of opinion. I stand by my opinion. You can call it a trope if you want to, but it's cliche to me. It's my prerogative to think that and you jumping down my back isn't going to change my mind.

[trinities.livejournal.com]

Dude, I'm not jumping down your back. But the fact still remains. What you're calling a cliche is the backbone of literature, things that have been prevalent since The Odyssey. I'm sorry that I felt the need to jump in and make sure you understood that. :/

[forchancookie.livejournal.com]

If you come in here to tell me that I'm bashing and insinuate that I don't appreciate collegiate studies and traditional media, I'm going to A) Get insulted and B) consider you to be jumping down my back.

Call it what you will, but calling a dog a canis lupus familiaris doesn't make it any less of a dog.

[trinities.livejournal.com]

Well, it comes off as if you dislike the very foundations of what makes fictional works. You dislike ... protagonists? Then how it is that you're going to continue watching anything? I'm sorry that I used the word "bash"--maybe I should have used something like "critically analyzing in a negative manner."