case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-06-04 07:02 pm

[ SECRET POST #3074 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3074 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #439.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
fishnchips: (Default)

[personal profile] fishnchips 2015-06-05 04:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, I love whump Loki as well - I don't even mind OOC-ness when it makes sense based on the plot, but some of those stories start with the OOC-ness when nothing has actually happened to the characters yet.

I think one of the reasons people think Fury would be down with torture is that he definitely seems like a very morally grey character and - at least in the MCU, as far as I know - has never really said he wouldn't condone torture if it was "for the greater good". So if the option isn't explicitly out of the question, it might just as well be possible.
Edited 2015-06-05 16:40 (UTC)