Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-06-07 03:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #3077 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3077 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Lackadaisy Cats]
__________________________________________________
03.

(Gorillaz)
__________________________________________________
04.

(Tripping over you)
__________________________________________________
05.

[Stitchers]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Dragon Age]
__________________________________________________
07.

[The Mighty Boosh]
__________________________________________________
08.

[LOVE LIVE!]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Brooklyn 99]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Mad Max Fury Road]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Maggie Stiefvater]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Emily Alice Ovenden]
__________________________________________________
13.

[When Marnie Was There/Omoide no Marnie]
__________________________________________________
14.

(Rick and Morty)
__________________________________________________
15.

[Suppression]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Wall-e]
__________________________________________________
17.

[Ancillary Justice & Ancillary Sword]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #440.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is that really a thing?
Mostly because it reinforces the "slacker/mediocre dudes can attract perfect/intelligent/beautiful/well-groomed/organized women but not vice verse" mentally, but also partially because I just love smartly dressed men in suits, so yeah. No personal appeal to me whatsoever.
And then they're marketed as chick flics? So it's supposed to be for women? But it's all about male wish fulfillment? IDEGI.
Re: Is that really a thing?
(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)"Congratulations, you get the man of your dreams - a lazy, mediocre, whiny manchild who you will have to feed and clothe and clean for the next 50 years until he dies of a heart attack due to lifestyle factors! So romantic!"
Who is this FOR, exactly?
Re: Is that really a thing?
Re: Is that really a thing?
(Anonymous) 2015-06-08 02:41 am (UTC)(link)Seriously, even in movies supposedly marketed towards women, no one wants to make even the whiniest, schlubbiest manchild in the potential audience feel like he is maybe not entitled to any woman he wants. Having the male lead be successful/passionate/not a lump might rock the boat.
Re: Is that really a thing?
Re: Is that really a thing?
(Anonymous) 2015-06-08 04:40 am (UTC)(link)You have to have the dude be competent on some level. And you have to make the movie basically from the point of view of the woman, and make her a good character and unapologetically successful and competent. or it just doesn't work.
(Although just for the sake of clarity, I think the point should be made that this problem is not unique to chick flicks, and in fact the best examples often come in things that are made by dudes - I'm looking at you, Zach Braff)