case: ([ Otacon; Trust me. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-01-29 06:50 am

[ SECRET POST #389 ]


⌈ Secret Post #389 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.


__________________________________________________



2.


__________________________________________________



3.


__________________________________________________



4.


__________________________________________________



5.


__________________________________________________



6.


__________________________________________________



7.


__________________________________________________



8.


__________________________________________________



9.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.


__________________________________________________



45.


__________________________________________________



46.


__________________________________________________



47.


__________________________________________________



48.


__________________________________________________



49.


__________________________________________________



50.


__________________________________________________



51.


__________________________________________________



52.


__________________________________________________



53.


__________________________________________________



54.


__________________________________________________



55.


__________________________________________________



56.


__________________________________________________



57.


__________________________________________________



58.


__________________________________________________



59.


__________________________________________________



60.


__________________________________________________



61.


__________________________________________________



62.


__________________________________________________



63.


__________________________________________________



64.


__________________________________________________



65.


__________________________________________________



66.


__________________________________________________



67.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 09 pages, 222 secrets from Secret Submission Post #056.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken link, [ 1 2 3 4 ] not!secret, [ 1 ] too big, [ 1 2 (yes, twice) ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, January 30th, 2008.
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
Yes because you are certainly the arbiter of what is valid. Just another example of CF ass kissing. *SMOOOOOOCH* You all think one another can do no wrong. If one of you killed someone in cold blood I'm sure you'd all leap up to say how it was justified. You really need to wipe that off your lips. Brown is an ugly color on you.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
This comment further proves that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

"You all think one another can do no wrong."

If you actually took time to read threads at the CF, you'd know that we don't think that way at all. Yes, we are close, but you can bet that if someone screws up, we're going to call him/her out on it, CF member or not. Most of the members at the CF are members BECAUSE they were called out on a wrong-doing. They took their beatings, got over it, and found out that we're a pretty awesome group of people. We can actually debate about issues (inside and outside the community) and, despite our differences, be totally cool with one another at the end of the day.

Brown may be an ugly color, but green looks even worse on you.

-SKIG

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 09:42 am (UTC)(link)
"Most of the members at the CF are members BECAUSE they were called out on a wrong-doing. They took their beatings, got over it, and found out that we're a pretty awesome group of people." isnt that called 'jumping in' in gang terms? where 12 people jump one individual, beat their ass for 5 mins then the victim looks up and mutters thru bloodied teeth "i can has in teh catfights now?" because they can be totally cool with each other at the end of the day. id lulz but i need to vomit now.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-02 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
"i can has in teh catfights now?"

QFT. Anon, I don't know who you are, but ilu. ilu 4eva! *insert generic pseudo-lesbian CF shit here*

Also, I think it's a mix between a gang-jump and a gang-bang. They are all pretendy-lesbians in there, after all.

--Anon2

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-02 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not the Anon that you love, but I have to say, I love both you anons. *BOOBIE SMASH* (That was the generic pseudo-lesbian CF shit.)

--Anon 3

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-05 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
ZOMG BOOBIES?! I SHOULD MAKE THAT INTO A PONY, BECAUSE ZOMG BOOBIES ARE GOOD, AND PONIES ARE GOOD, AND LESBIANS ARE GOOD, SO PONY + BOOBIES + LESBIAN= MEGA WIN! LET'S TACK ON A VA-JAY-JAY TOO, JUST SO I CAN EXPRESS MY OWN FRUSTRATED SEXUALITY.

:P ilu too, Anon3. XD
-Anon2

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-05 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Lez B friendz!!!

Who says anonymouses can't hook up? You can write me.

notalwaysanonymous@gmail.com

Oh, and any hate mail received will be returned with full force.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-12 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
Oooh, I shall do so! Anonymous power!

I also vote that you post any and all hate mail you recieve to the new Encyclopedia Dramatica entry about the Arena. If you're not the original poster, I think you can still sign up to edit it.

Also, ignore Angelberries' dramawhoring in the CF/Sunday F!S thread; she's just attempting to be as baiting and snarky as we Anonymous, but sadly she fails horrifically. I think it's those Pullips she emulates so intensely; with those gigantic googily eye sockets, there's not much room for a brain in there.

Still waiting

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-25 20:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Still waiting

(Anonymous) - 2008-04-09 00:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
That quote is from the link you posted to the other LJ thread. Maybe you should read the whole post before you focus on one part and use it as "proof" of whatever.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
I did not post a link to any other LJ thread. Sorry. You'll have to deal with the fact as I said that there's more than one person here who doesn't like you.

And to Skig, green is not my color you are correct. The idea that I'd envy any of you and your multitude of deathly illnesses and suicides and eating disorders and dying pets and abusive partners and lost jobs and GEDs and yadda yadda yadda is laughable. Now if you'll excuse me unlike some of you CF freaks who will be hanging out in your "HURRY GET IN CHAT NOW!" tonight I have a date.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
How am I supposed to keep up with all your personalities? Maybe if you were paying attention you would understand that " " means something SOMEONE ELSE said. Instead of piping in with "you're the god of what's valid." Just a suggestion, so you don't continue to look like an asshat.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe if you put some context with your quotes one could understand why you posted them and they'd actually make sense. But really if you're against the CF harpies then the enemy of my enemy is my friend and I've got no quarrel with you. *shrug*

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
The idea that you would poke fun at anyone experiencing any of the things that you listed is disgusting. I will not address you further here, since you cannot post your username for whatever lame reason you may have previously listed. You know where to find us. It's obvious that you lurk there, though you fail to mention or acknowledge the good things. It's such a shame that you can hate a certain group of people that you know nothing about based on SELECTIVE reading. It's an even bigger shame that you can provide no logical reason for your hate.

You have a date tonight. Big.Deal...Seriously... I'll await your laughable explanation of how that makes you better than anyone else.

-skig

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 03:25 am (UTC)(link)
The bottom line is that it's okay to talk shit about the Catfights people, and to make generalizations about them. It's okay to make anon postings on random fandoms and forums attacking them. That's totally okay. That doesn't make you a bitter bitch with a mountain of problems taking them out on other people.

But if the people at Catfights think it's okay for THEM to talk shit about other people. They are sorely mistaken.

Only people clouded under the guise of fake names and sugar-sweet, passive aggressive comments are allowed to insult other people and get away with it.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry and your real name is? Angelberries? Skig? DemonicSympohny? Kitari? What? Those are fake names? You can call me Jane Doe. There's a real name for me.

The difference between what you do and what I do is I'm only talking shit about people who deserve it for the way they talk shit about others. You guys frequently talk shit about people who have never said anything rotten about anyone.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
I am not poking fun at anyone for experiencing those things. I'm poking fun at people who somehow think it's normal to post about those deeply personal things on a public message board to people who are pretty much strangers. Frequently it sounds like you're just trying to outdo one another about who has had it worse. At the same time you make fun of people who do the same thing at the Arena, so don't think I'm falling for your indignant attitude. One of the most digusting examples was when you people piled on that poor woman who was trying to leave an abusive husband because she had elected to have kids with him early on.

I dislike you mostly because a large lot of you are nasty haters and another lot are weak and fall all over yourselves to let the others step all over you after which you thank them for it. For the most part you have hugely inflated images of your intelligence and relish in mocking others you consider beneath you.

Consider this a taste of your own attitude minus the rancidness. And you're right that I lurk. My real-life friends and I find it like tracking Britney Spears escapades: a train wreck you can't stop watching no matter how gory it gets. You've provided us with several minutes of unbridled amusement and a few lunch topics. We're even debating whether you all share some unspecified pscyhological disorder that prevents you from seeing how abnormal most of you are and what it should be called. The fact that you even care what I think is one of the symptoms. You all care way too much what everyone else thinks about everything while you pretend you have oodles of self-confidence and attitude. You've found your little power corner and you dwell in it with such glee this little piece of cyber turf you've carved out and defend from imaginary encroachment. It's about as pathetic as watching Sylvester Stallone in the new Rambo movie.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
Don't confuse my patronage with care. For the sake of argument, it's been real fun watching you roll around in the mud trying to find a way to justify reasons you stalk people on a particular board and make a mental note of everything they do just to bring it up later. Issues come and go in ponyland, that's the nature of humans. We love, we hate. But you, you dwell. You dwell and you harbor it, and then you think it makes you better than them because you "watch it like a train wreck." No, you watch, because you're looking for your name. No doubt, when it's brought up you lash out in an underhanded manner like this, and think that it somehow justifies you.

The truth, dear Jane, is that you are trash. You are no higher or no lower than the people you loathe. You high horses knees are shot, and your amour is cheap aluminum.

But whatever you tell yourself so you can sleep at night. Snuggle your giant Pinkie Pie close. She loves you. Flaws and all.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I love how it's stalking when someone faults you for the things you post on one board but when you follow others around to a multitude of boards (I'm sure Babysnuzzle and a few others can attest to this) and recap their "escapades" and interfere with their lives and interactions with others, it's "pony justice." Please consider this one person's "pony justice."

The truth, dear whoever you may be, is that you are a hypocrite. You are lower than the people you loathe, and your horse is a Shetland. Your armour is as thick as your skin, which appears to be pretty shallow.

I have no problem sleeping at night and this bothers you far more than it does me because it doesn't bother me one iota, any more than your silly speculations about who or what I share my bed with. I love me. Flaws and all. Whether anyone else does is something you can only guess at and probably guess wrong.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
He's a mini horse. Not a pony. And while your attempts to save face are very long winded, I know you just can't wait to see what the CF forum has to say about your sorry ass next. Because you care. You care too much. Unfortunately for you, I don't fall into any of the catergories you list. Never stalked people, never "solved a case," I'm just me. So while it's fun for you to assume that you're attacking one of you most loathed, I'm not any of those people that are so far under your skin you can't get them out with a vat of acid.

But I do find you funny. And I'll egg you on, because like you, I'm amused by what you have to say next. You've been jolly great fun to poke at.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-01 22:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know that it's really all that smart to go around bragging that you and your "real-life" friends have nothing better to do than track people on a message board. It seems like you and your friends are losers. When I hang out with my "real-life" friends, we don't log onto a computer and read message boards. We have way better things to do than consume ourselves with such pettiness.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry but ponies do not count as real life friends and curling their hair with straws does not constitute something beyond pettiness.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-05 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
No shit Sherlock. I didn't mean your definition of real friends. I meant actual human beings. Try to get out more often.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-05 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-06 04:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-06 05:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

[identity profile] angelberries.livejournal.com 2008-02-01 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Do your therapists actually think that spending all of your time stalking someone and reading all of their posts/friends posts is actually good for you? Or what, don't they know how you spend your entire day hanging off the typed words of people you don't even know, have never seen and in some examples, are halfway around the world? Do you really think that anyone other than you would consider that normal? Because if we (the CF) are all that consume your life, I'm afraid its a pathetic one. I have to say, I spend all day everyday on the internet (I'm not ashamed to admit that I enjoy being at home) and I don't have the time to read half of the posts you claim to be reading. You are truly pitiable.

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you actually think I care what you think about what you assume is my life? I don't spend "all day everyday on the internet" nor do I stay home all the time making oodles of posts to my imaginary friends. I can't help it if I read much more quickly than you. Do you actually think accusing me of having a "therapist" is going to inflict some sort of pain? I'm crying in my Cheerios.

Re: 15

[identity profile] angelberries.livejournal.com - 2008-02-01 22:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-01 22:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-02 07:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-02 16:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-05 23:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-02 16:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-05 05:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-05 23:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-05 23:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-06 03:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-06 04:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-06 05:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-07 02:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-07 05:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-07 19:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) - 2008-02-07 19:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 15

(Anonymous) 2008-02-01 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
(Anonymous) wrote:
2008-01-31 10:10 pm UTC (link)
http://community.livejournal.com/fandomsecrets/100858.html?thread=21295610#t21295610

_____________________________

An expert from the link:

_____________________________


"no one is perfect and almost all of the rants I saw there are valid."

(Look familiar?)