case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-07-29 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #3129 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3129 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #447.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
erinptah: (Default)

Re: * OP *

[personal profile] erinptah 2015-07-29 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Tangent question, but how do you have a "headcanon" for a character being deaf or blind? Isn't that it an obvious canon trait when someone can or can't see/hear?

Re: * OP * OP answering

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Ahhhh, that's because they're in Transformers. One is a character who wears a visor(I headcanon that there's no optics underneath) and the other has a helm that covers where his audios are(I headcanon that they were melted and the helm hides that.) You'd think they could just "fix" it but it's not so simple. They're in an ableist society that looks down on anyone who is flawed.

Re: * OP * OP answering

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
All actual canon to the contrary.

Re: * OP * OP answering

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
That's why it's a "headcanon" anon.

Re: * OP * OP answering

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Headcanon is when you fill in a gap with something you imagined, not when you contradict actual canon.

Re: * OP * OP answering

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
DA

It's not required to be that way. Besides, what if you get jossed? Throw out everything you imagined just because it isn't canon?
erinptah: (Default)

Re: * OP * OP answering

[personal profile] erinptah 2015-07-30 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
...no, but you do stop calling it "headcanon," and start thinking of it as an AU that you happen to like.

/knows nothing of Transformers canon, can't comment on those specific characters
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

Re: * OP * OP answering

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2015-07-30 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
No it isn't. I have a headcanon where Andtraste was a Silmaril. How is that filling in gaps? There are no gaps in Dragon Age that need to be filled by a shiny stone from LotR, but I do it anyway.

A headcanon can be as simple as an AU idea that is your pet favourite and most dominant personal version of the plot.