[ SECRET POST #3129 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3129 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #447.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

Sexually experienced/suave Steve Rogers

Note that I have nothing against such characters (Tony Stark) or even if you want to interpret other characters this way (such as Bucky or Natasha).

But it just doesn't work with Steve.

This is guy who, by his own admission, barely knew how to speak to women. Who looks completely lost when kisses are planted on him. Who is uncomfortable with public displays of affection.

And even if you think that he could have had experience with men (since the whole not knowing how to speak with women doesn't apply there), there's still the issue of the guy waiting for the right partner and being terribly awkward.

It just doesn't work. He doesn't have to be a monk or anything but...he's no Tony Stark either.

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

Like, is that an AU or something? Because yeah, I can't see that in canon-compliant stuff at all.

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT but I think a lot of people just write Steve as essentially the most sexually desirable man possible, in the same way that I think a lot of people write Darcy as a generic female reader / writer stand-in

(And I like Darcy/Steve as a ship...)

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

I think he is the most sexually desirable man possible, but for me the inexperience is part of it, lol.