case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-08-08 03:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3139 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3139 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 097 secrets from Secret Submission Post #449.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Devil's Advocate

(Anonymous) 2015-08-08 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
The Star Trek reboot is a way for classic characters and imagery to be made accessible to a modern audience. The barriers to enjoyment of the classic series are simply too great; not just the special effects and sets, but the ham-handed 1960s "issue" episodes and the Shatner Factor. The entire conceptual ethos of the show is essentially gibberish to Millennials, so starting it over fresh, using a visual and conceptual language that makes sense to modern audiences, is simple good sense.

Re: Devil's Advocate

(Anonymous) 2015-08-08 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
IA. I still think they fucked it up. It's trash. They had the chance to make something accessible yet still great. Instead they made shallow, throw away, badly written crap for the Tumblr generation.

Re: Devil's Advocate

(Anonymous) 2015-08-08 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I feel like most people failed to grasp the point of this game. It's sad.

Re: Devil's Advocate

(Anonymous) 2015-08-08 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Without the "issue" episodes and the cerebral themes, it's barely even Star Trek. Even Enterprise had a little of that.

Revitalizing Trek shouldn't mean turning it into Star Wars; it should mean reconnecting it to the literary science fiction roots lost when Gene had TNG written in-house.