case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-10 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3172 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3172 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
(Ollie Locke)


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Forever]


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
[Doctor Who]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #453.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
leisuretime: (Default)

"It had so much potential..."

[personal profile] leisuretime 2015-09-10 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Devour could have been 2 different and reasonably OK movies. Instead it largely fails.

So let's talk about things that did not live up to their potential at all.

Re: "It had so much potential..."

(Anonymous) 2015-09-10 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
American version of State of Play. It could have been SO great, given the changes in journalism since the original was made, and the big differences between the US and UK journalism/politics/police relationship. But the movie didn't change enough; I think they should have used the original as a jumping-off point instead of trying to replicate it exactly and take a lot of short cuts.

They did get the horror movie-esque lighting of the DC Metro right, though. I respect that.

Re: "It had so much potential..."

(Anonymous) 2015-09-10 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Hobbit movies

You had a great cast. You had more money to do things right. You had a lot of the original group of people from LOTR behind the scenes. Moving to 3 movies could have meant opening up interesting stuff.

It was all wasted.
elaminator: (The Hobbit: Bilbo - Going on an adventur)

Re: "It had so much potential..."

[personal profile] elaminator 2015-09-11 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
I think had they been left at 2 films and focused on the dwarves more the films would've been great.

As is, they're kind of a mess. (But I still find things to like about them.)

Re: "It had so much potential..."

(Anonymous) 2015-09-11 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. Initially, I defended the 3 movies because I thought it would give more time to explore 13 characters and plotlines like Dol Goldur. But since they didn't do any of that, I think a lot of the issues in the movies that were actually made would be solved if they'd cut it down to 2 and throw everything else into an EE.

But, I still see the third movie as wasted potential because they *could* have done more to explore plotlines and characters and shaped the movies to fit the 3-movie structure. The whole thing was wasted potential IMHO.
elaminator: (The Hobbit: Thorin)

Re: "It had so much potential..."

[personal profile] elaminator 2015-09-11 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)
IA, yea. I didn't despair when I heard we were getting three films either because like you, I think they could've made it work; it ended up feeling like a lot of...well, filler. A lot of the extra stuff made the films feel bloated and unnecessarily long.

Had it been a bit tighter, more focused and no-nonsense, it could've been good.

If not, a more straightforward adaption would've worked with 2 films.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: "It had so much potential..."

[personal profile] tabaqui 2015-09-11 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
Agree so hard with this.
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

Re: "It had so much potential..."

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2015-09-11 12:04 pm (UTC)(link)
The first movie was good, but the second two went downhill. I can't even say that the Mirkwood Elves were the start of it, because I feel Beorn's house the trek through Mirkwood before the Elves came in was cut too short, but I feel the movies concentrated too much on the Elves when they did come in.

The movies should have concentrated more on the dwarves than they did (which is why I feel the first movie was good, because it stayed with the dwarves), and the love triangle was stupid and mishandled.

Actually, to get specific on the love triangle, it might have been good, if Tauriel had not ended up so pathetic by the third movie, but I feel her "strong woman" characterisation got crippled by the romance.

I also think there was too much Legolas on a whole. Too much "Legolas does cool shit!" to the detriment of anyone else doing cool tricks. I was always glad he would make an appearance, because he would have been there, somewhere, but... too much.
caerbannog: (Default)

Re: "It had so much potential..."

[personal profile] caerbannog 2015-09-11 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
Revolution TV series
dahli: winnar @ lj (Default)

Re: "It had so much potential..."

[personal profile] dahli 2015-09-11 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
Free! with the unnecessary drama and half-assed resolution in S2. S1 was nice, but S2 dropped the ball with Haru and his bird resolution, Sousuke being shoulder!pregnant and Rei and Nagisa getting their own "very special episode" before being shafted into the background.

Fate series: Gilgamesh as a villain in general.

Prometheus (movie) would have been interesting as the "Alien" prequel, like it was intended.

Snow White and the Huntsman and I'm still mad about this!