fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3175 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3175 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Eh, I find that a lot of Europeans especially get very defensive when Americans/Australians identify as their ethnic background. I understand if someone is claiming to know a lot about a country and they don't actually, that's annoying. But I find it annoying too when people try to discount other people's heritage, or mock them for trying to connect to that. Even people several generations past immigration still have history, especially when their immigrant ancestors often lived in communities which to some extent kept certain parts of the culture alive in a way that affects regional areas in a lot of places even today.

I suppose it's a language thing, because there isn't a natural way to separate heritage/ethnicity from nationality. Well, that is, in America it would be assumed - if someone said they were Scottish, people would understand that they aren't a Scottish national. So the way Americans talk about heritage, I think, can be easily taken the wrong way by Europeans as well.

I share your annoyance though when people with no modern connection to a country act like they understand it better or are entitled to a more meaningful opinion about a particular country than anyone else, because modern day problems are different from heritage.

Americans do it too, but almost exclusively in the form of shitting on Italian and Irish Americans.

I've never heard of this being a problem? Maybe a regional issue, my area doesn't have many Italian-Americans at all.

What, seriously? There's not as many as there used to be, but there's still a lot of Italians where I am (when my roommate's grandma died she came back from the funeral claiming she had no clue what anyone said to her because most of it was in Italian/everyone's English was accented.) And I'm roughly half Irish. I'd have to go back 50 years, minimum, to find the kind of anti-Italian and anti-Irish sentiment you're talking about.

Yeah. I'm a genealogist and I have a lot of pride in where my ancestors came from, but at the same time I would never presume to really be Irish or Scottish.

OTOH, there are communities that have retained a lot of ethnic traditions and culture, so I think they have a bit of a right to call themselves whatever they call themselves. For example, a Polish community within a town where most people speak Polish and make Polish food and many have been to Poland. (Although that's also becoming more rare with younger generations wanting to modernize.)

But why shouldn't a person of Polish heritage who doesn't do those things not be also able to identify as Polish (ethnicity)? They are just as Polish as anyone in Poland, after all. Again, I think it's just an awkward language thing, because people don't clearly differentiate between "Polish" as an ethnicity and "Polish" as an actual active nationality. Either way, someone with a Polish background will have that background whether they actively engage in it or not, the history is still theirs as much as it is anyone else's. But I do get what you mean about actively engaging in the culture vs just having a passing interest. They are different, absolutely, but I'd say people's heritages don't just disappear if they aren't used, and that heritage has undoubtedly affected who and what you are to some extent.

I mean, if you live in a country like America, it's totally typical to say you're Scottish/Irish. I don't see how that's a problem at all. I think the problem is when you use that to justify on how you're an expert in all things Scottish or Irish and you understand the modern country in the same way that a person of Scottish or Irish nationality does. (but importantly, not all of Scottish/Irish nationality would be of that ethnicity. You might very well be more "Scottish" (by blood) than loads of Scottish nationals today... some Scottish, after all, are not "Scottish" by even a drop.)

I'm rambling, but identity is a funny thing, and it's really interesting to me.

[ SECRET POST #3175 ]

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over

Re: Dumb stuff you're judgy over