Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-10-24 03:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #3216 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3216 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

(The Blacklist)
__________________________________________________
03.

[The Sum Of Us/Russell Crowe]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Dan and Phil]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Tokyo Ghoul:re]
__________________________________________________
06.

[dick grayson]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Scandinavia and the World]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Doctor Who]
__________________________________________________
09.

[One Piece]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Lost Dimension]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Sleepy Hollow]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #460.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)Because there are characters that I feel like can be read bisexual (or gay) but aren't necessarily canon either way (re: Tulio and Miguel from El Dorado). I don't consider anyone canon-straight until the narrative makes it that way.
But my first thought would be Cloud Strife, I'd make him canon bisexual, even though I do think he is bisexual in the extant game (with dates with Barret and such).
Or wait, maybe a couple het-only romance options in Dragon Age, I'd make bisexual, because I'd rather all romance options be bisexual. So Alistair, Morrigan and Cassandra at least...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)This also fits the same description though.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)I mean, it wouldn't surprise me if they turned out not to be later, but both types would be ostensibly straight to me.
no subject