[ SECRET POST #3234 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3234 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Golden Girls]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Boku no Hero Academia]


__________________________________________________



03.
[C.S. Lewis vs. J.R.R. Tolkien]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Pokémon, Leah Remini]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Tales of Zestiria]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Man In The High Castle]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Marjorie Liu, Sana Takeda, Monstress]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sleepy Hollow]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, buy it for whatever reason you want, but don't somehow convince yourself you're being "noble" or above the rest just because you bought something created by women.

[(Anonymous)]

Uh, where does OP state that? They're just pointing out that they initially wanted to buy the book because of its creative team (presumably to support more female-led books) but they feel weird about now having another reason that you can't rattle off in polite company. Simple.

Also, OP: rock on.

OP

[(Anonymous)]

Well, okay, kinkbait aside, the art is gorgeous.

[(Anonymous)]

Uh, they say it right there in the secret text.

"[T]hen I saw this panel...and acquired less noble reasons." Meaning, their prior reasons -- a female writer and a female artist -- are somehow "noble reasons."

[(Anonymous)]

Do you have no ability at all to detect when someone is being tongue-in-cheek?

[(Anonymous)]

The thing is, even tongue-in-cheekiness is built around a grain of truth.

[(Anonymous)]

Less noble… as in, the commonly used phrase for prurient interests "less than noble intentions"? Take what you will from it, but I think it's just a fun way to say "KINKY INTERESTS".

OP again

[(Anonymous)]

So, with a limited budget my first impulse was "look into this because if I'm going to spend money I'd prefer to spend it in support of female creators" ... partly because I feel I'm less likely to get the Same Old Shit.

And then once I saw the art I was like, Oh yes, eye candy take my money now.

If the story turns out to be crap then I'll drop it.

P.S., Yes, noble was meant roguishly. Sorry it spun you.

[(Anonymous)]

Rawwwrrrr yes, supporting female creators is misandry, rarrghharblegarble!

[(Anonymous)]

Hi, strawman. Nobody said that.

[chardmonster]

I can see where AYRT is going with this. There's plenty of absolute drivel produced by women (as well as guys, obviously). Buying something shitty just because a woman made it is laughable.

Now if you want to support GOOD female creators? Awesome! We need more people actually paying for women's work. But if your only criteria is "a girl did it" I should start a Patreon immediately, I have MS-Paint and enough opinions for at least $5 a month and your standards are low.

[(Anonymous)]

Marjorie Liu is a good writer. I don't know the artist, but judging from the picture the OP used, I'd say she is good too. So I don't think it is a bad thing to want to support this work just because of the two of them being involved. Not that I would consider it "noble" exactly, but I would consider it a good thing.