[ SECRET POST #3295 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3295 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #471.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[blitzwing]

That's a moral relativist perspective nonny, and those aren't popular here.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

Well, too bad.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

Yes they are. People will gladly justify rape, homophobia, etc. by saying "He was young!" "It was a different era!" "It's a cultural difference!"

It's all bullshit, and F!S revels in it.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[blitzwing]

That's just justification due to cognitive dissonance, not a true endorsement of moral relativism. I suppose AIRT might fall into that category as well.

Certainly when we've actually talked about moral philosophies, few rally to the banner of moral relativism.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, I'm definitely on the side of moral relativism.

A rock star in his 20s having sex with a 15-year-old girl today would be a lot sketchier than Bowie having sex with a 15-year-old in 1973, because our society's perception of that kind of relationship has changed on a fundamental level. A rock star today would and should know better. But back then, it was not seen as a problem; the girls felt they had agency, and the broader culture viewed it the same way.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

Go tell Lori Mattix that she was raped.

Because, see, that's the thing that people like you are completely glossing over: how your supposed "victim" feels about this. You actually given a shit about the woman involved? Why don't you trust her narrative instead of trying to force it to fit into yours? Why don't you trust the women who were her age during that time, who are saying that this is what they did, that they went out looking to do it, and that they had a blast?

You know the answer. The answer is that you don't actually care about them, how they feel, or whether they were harmed. You only care about your ability to use them as props. You are treating Mattix worse than Bowie every did, because you are insisting that she be a victim and be broken for you.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

An adult having sex with a 15 year old is rape.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

It is today. It wasn't then.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

Both of you go to bed.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

Shit or get off the pot.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

Go to bed, you sleepyhead.

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

[(Anonymous)]

Take a look, it's in a book, a reading raaainboooooow.