case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-13 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #3297 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3297 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #471.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Um

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
That's not exactly true though, is it? Doesn't asexual mean no sexual attraction to other people? Don't some asexual people really like masturbation? I wouldn't call that no sex drive.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: Um

[personal profile] feotakahari 2016-01-14 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
"Sex drive" is the phrase I most frequently see used on the Internet by people who are not asexual. The only asexual person I follow is Yahtzee Croshaw, whose phrasing is that he prefers his hand. I don't know what the proper phrasing is.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: Um

[personal profile] blitzwing 2016-01-14 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
"people who are not asexual."

Um...and why are you relying on people who are not asexual to define asexuality for you? Because almost every asexual source takes great pains to point out that asexuality is not defined by one's sex drive in any way.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: Um

[personal profile] feotakahari 2016-01-14 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
Like I said, I don't follow many people who are asexual. I'm just parroting what I read on the Internet.

(Actually, hold up. What sources are you going from? I used to post on AVEN, and they were creepily obsessed with a dichotomy between asexuals, who they framed as having no sex drives, and everyone else, who they assumed must have insatiable, never-ending sex drives. It was honestly kind of fucked up, and it was the main reason I stopped posting there.)
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: Um

[personal profile] blitzwing 2016-01-14 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe if you don't have a good grasp of the finer points of a minority group's identity, and don't identify as that yourself, you shouldn't go around educating people about them? I mean it doesn't take more than a few minutes to hit google and make sure you're not giving out misinformation.

When did you post on AVEN? Because I've been a member there for a over half a decade now, and for that time they've always had information out about such terms as non-libidinous and such.

Other sources: asexual wikis, pretty much every asexual blogger out there, and erryone on Tumblr. No one except ignorant (and I don't mean that as an insult) non-asexuals defines it as anything other than "doesn't experience sexual attraction".*

*Without getting into the gray stuff anyway
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: Um

[personal profile] feotakahari 2016-01-14 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
I remember I posted on AVEN at some point during high school, which I left in 2010.

As for the rest of this, I don't even know what to say. All I was trying to say is that asexual doesn't mean sex-repulsed. From what the "friendly neighborhood asexual" poster said below, I didn't think I got it that wrong, but if you want me to apologize, I'll do so.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: Um

[personal profile] blitzwing 2016-01-14 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
That makes sense. I guess things must have changed after that.

You don't have to apologize. It's just sexual attraction, sex drive, and sexual repulsion are three distinct issues. Sex repulsion doesn't necessarily correlate with sex drive.

Re: Um

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, the technical definition is that it's just about attraction, but that doesn't always make sense. I think it would make more sense if it just meant that someone didn't like sex.
sarillia: (Default)

Re: Um

[personal profile] sarillia 2016-01-14 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Makes sense to me. Heterosexual=attraction to different sex, homosexual=attraction to same sex, bisexual=attraction to both same and different sex, asexual=attraction to no sex.

These are the definitions I always go back to because they make the most sense to me. I don't like basing it on behavior because people act out of line with their orientation all the time (whether through experimenting or trying to conform to expectations or whatever). I don't think going by the desire to have sex makes sense either because you can be attracted to someone but not actually want to have sex with them or vice versa and that conscious desire to sleep with someone rather than a simple physical attraction seems a lot more complicated and influenced by outside factors.

Re: Um

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
you can be attracted to someone but not actually want to have sex with them or vice versa

See, that's what I don't get. The best definition I've been able to find for sexual attraction is that it makes you want to have sex with someone. If being sexually attracted to someone LITERALLY MEANS you want to have sex with them, how can you be sexually attracted to someone without wanting to have sex with them?

I don't know, the whole thing is just confusing to me.

Re: Um

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
Imagine the difference between 1) seeing a chocolate cake and thinking it looks good to eat and 2) seeing a chocolate cake and thinking it looks good to eat and definitely wanting to eat.

You might be interested in the chocolate cake because it looks like the kind of thing that would taste good to you, but you might not feel hungry at the moment or you're hungry for something else or you know there could be negative consequences to eating the chocolate cake, and so on, so you can think the cake looks good to eat without necessarily actually, truly wanting to eat the cake.
sarillia: (Default)

Re: Um

[personal profile] sarillia 2016-01-14 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
You can find someone physically attractive but hate their personality and want nothing to do with them with or without clothes on. Just for one example.

Re: Um

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not asexual, but I feel like there's kinds of attraction. Like, I can be superficially or emotionally attracted to someone but not want to get sexual with them. The feelings aren't platonic, it's definitely a crush, just not a crush that would be satisfied with sex (and the thought of sex with them kind of ruins the appeal). And there's people I'm sexually attracted to who I would never actually want to talk to or hang out with or even...be around for extended periods of time, there's no emotional attraction there.

Re: Um

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
SA - "different kinds of attraction", ugh

Re: Um

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 11:54 am (UTC)(link)
Then I must not be a lesbian since I only want to have sex with SOME women. Or there are people I'm attracted to but repulsed by enough that I wouldn't go to bed with them.