Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-02-02 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #3317 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3317 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[D.Gray-man - Miranda Lotto]
__________________________________________________
06.

[The Thick of It]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Golden Kamui]
__________________________________________________
08.

(The Lost Boys)
__________________________________________________
09.

[Marble Hornets/troyhasacamera]
__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

[@midnight with Chris Hardwick]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 12:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 12:24 am (UTC)(link)At least for me, it makes you seem approachable and that's always a good thing imo.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:34 am (UTC)(link)Personally I think it's better to thank the readers in an authors note like, "Thanks for all the support!" Or something like that.
Leave your replies for whenever you have something to add or questions to answer.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 04:00 am (UTC)(link)One more example of how you really can't please everybody. I HATE it when authors thank readers in authors' notes, especially when the notes appear between chapters of the fic. It throws me out of the story, and it also makes me feel as though the author's tooting their own horn a bit too blatantly. I'd far rather any thank yous from the author appear in the comments section, where I can avoid them if I want.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 04:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 09:30 am (UTC)(link)(tangent now) a lot of it is personal preference, but! this wankery around inflated comments?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:55 pm (UTC)(link)a lot of it is personal preference, but! this wankery around inflated comments?
It's such a Machiavellian perspective!
I will say, there was one time I was annoyed to open a fic with 26 comments only to discover that it wasn't a decent-to-good fic with 13 to 26 comment threads, but an abysmal fic with 2 comment threads, the longer of which was the author and a super-enthusiastic reader analyzing the fic in exhaustive detail. But even then, I was much less annoyed at the author than I was at AO3 for displaying the number of comments rather than the number of comment threads. And I certainly wasn't so paranoid as to imagine that the author was engaging in the conversation for some devious purpose!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 02:05 am (UTC)(link)I don't understand the place that people who do see it as "desperate" or a sneaky way of inflating comment count are coming from AT ALL, and I'm really grateful my brain doesn't work that way because it seems like a really nasty way to see the world.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)I don't understand the place that people who do see it as "desperate" or a sneaky way of inflating comment count are coming from AT ALL
They're jealous assholes who figure that if anyone else is getting a lot of comments, they must be "cheating" somehow. Nobody leaves THEM comments!