case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-12 07:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #3327 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3327 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Leonard Snart/Ray Palmer, DC's Legends of Tomorrow]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________





























05. [SPOILERS for Downton Abbey]





__________________________________________________



06.[WARNING for suicide]



[Mare Internum]


__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for sexual assault]



[Love Live - sorry anon who wanted it Saturday, trying to keep the warning ones on Friday]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for rape, abuse, etc]





__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for rape/dub-con, child abuse]





__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for rape]





__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for underage sex]






__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for sexual abuse, child abuse]




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #475.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Controversial (Non-Fandom) Confessions

(Anonymous) 2016-02-13 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
I think there should be a close-in-age exception with no limit, but otherwise I am good with 16 as the general age of consent. (Although, yes, people who are no longer in their teens seeking out 16 year olds is skeevy as hell. Also kind of boring and inconvenient - you can't take them to a lot of bars or clubs, they're not independent of their parents and may have a curfew or at least a parent asking lots of questions, and what the hell do you talk about?)

Re: Controversial (Non-Fandom) Confessions

(Anonymous) 2016-02-13 04:30 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT I am all for close-in-age exceptions. Doesn't matter how I feel about teenagers having sex, they're gonna do it anyway and they shouldn't get in trouble for it.

All of those things you said are why I cannot believe anyone who would claim to be genuinely interested in a 16 year old. I'm sure someone will pop up with an exception, but the exception does not disprove the rule.