Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-02-14 04:08 pm
[ SECRET POST #3329 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3329 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #476.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-14 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-14 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 00:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 04:09 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-14 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 00:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 04:11 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-14 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-14 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-14 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-14 23:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 00:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 04:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 00:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 00:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 00:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 01:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 01:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 00:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-15 01:15 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-15 12:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Yadda yadda look harder yadda, but when pulling random books off the library's YA shelf has a 99% chance of landing me something with a cliched love triangle...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-14 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-14 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)Big publishers will beat a trope to death. They will keep making authors churn this stuff out until nobody is buying it. And yes, big publishers do often buy what's popular right now...even if it's not very good, just to earn money. Wait, they're greedy assholes? Yes, a lot of times, yes.
If you want original, good storytelling you will SOMETIMES have to leap outside your box and try independent authors. Yes, you might get burned sometimes. But indie authors are far more likely to be willing to try new things, to write the stories they want even if it can't fit into a Hunger Games (etc) mold.
If you want original stories, and want them to succeed, you need to find and support them, not wait for the big publishers to start choosing better content. They most likely won't. They want "the next Harry Potter" or "the next Hunger Games," not small name but original content. They have proven that in the way they treat authors for years.
If the love triangles with a super special white girl sell...then many people will write that. Some will even write it well.
But yeah, I don't even bother with YA anymore because I'm just not interested in a romance with teens.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-14 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-15 06:03 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-15 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-15 12:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-15 12:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-15 12:57 am (UTC)(link)Though I was just thinking the other day, why is a love triangle a love triangle? A triangle has two sides. A love triangle generally just has two. A likes B, and C likes B, but A and C don't like each other. It should be love angle or something. I dunno, but it just seems somewhat confusing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-15 01:46 am (UTC)(link)Well, yeah.
(Anonymous) 2016-02-15 02:58 am (UTC)(link)