Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-03-03 06:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #3347 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3347 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[The Sound of Music]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Step Up Revolution]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Richonne & Ichabbie/Andy+Danai, Nicole+Tom]
__________________________________________________
06.

(Hamilton)
__________________________________________________
07.

[Elementary]
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #478.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-03 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-03 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-03 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-03 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)like, rob liefeld
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 01:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-03 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)And only cishet men would ever enjoy anything like that, of course.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 06:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 12:34 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-03 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)Unless you are you, apparently, OP.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 00:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 01:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 02:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 05:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 02:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-03 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)I'm a woman, and a lesbian, and I have zero problem with characters being drawn sexually, especially if that is the purpose of the art.
I agree it's annoying when you have women in sexy poses in non-sexy situations, sure.
But it's okay to have sexy art. There's nothing inherently wrong with kink art that is meant to be arousing. I don't think the artist actually thinks women have three foot long boobs.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 00:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 00:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 00:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 00:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 00:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 06:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 06:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 14:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 13:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 23:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 02:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 03:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-04 12:00 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 01:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-04 12:07 am (UTC)(link)It depends on context whether I agree with your secret - I mean, this looks like it's from porn, and porn isn't exactly expected to have a realistic depiction of anyone. Now if you expect me to believe that that woman is, say, a secret superspy who just HAPPENS to dress in lingerie and has boobs down to her knees, that'd be more of a problem.
(But even if it is just porn, that is some terrible terrible art. YIKES.)
no subject
I just think people tend to disagree on what is or isn't problematic specifically.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 02:21 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 00:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 07:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-05 00:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-04 12:42 am (UTC)(link)/scrolls
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-04 01:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-04 01:15 am (UTC)(link)all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) 2016-03-04 01:17 am (UTC)(link)I certainly have to wonder if any of you have enormous tits.
Re: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 01:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 01:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 01:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 04:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 01:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 01:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 02:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
Re: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 07:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 08:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 17:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 18:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 02:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 02:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
Re: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 03:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
Re: all those saying "bad anatomy"...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-04 01:29 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 02:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 03:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 05:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I did a Google search
Re: I did a Google search
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 05:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: I did a Google search
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-04 02:15 am (UTC)(link)Not that I draw some kind of hard line and go, "You're a bad person if you like this." I just find it squicky - particularly because, though it is rare in its extremity, it's merely an extreme example of a very prevalent way of depicting women.
I would also find something like this squicky if it were a picture of a guy with a disablingly huge penis and/or testicles. Though in that case, because it wouldn't play into a pervasive and widely accepted narrative of male sexual objectification, it would probably bother me somewhat less.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 03:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 05:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 07:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 08:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 12:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 14:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 14:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 20:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 23:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-04 17:33 (UTC) - Expand