Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-03-05 12:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #3349 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3349 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

[X/1999]
Notes:
Early today, places to go!
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - random memes with no secrets in them ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Advice
(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)* if this forum is about encouraging people, you expect any "criticism" to be civil and kind and CONSTRUCTIVE. "Your idea is shitty" is not constructive.
* no dogpiling.
* if criticism starts to derail a thread or meanders away from the aim of a thread, you remind people that they've had their say and it's time to move the discussion back on course, i.e. for people who have suggestions for how a crossover could be done well.
* universal ban on "You shouldn't write this because I think it's bad!"
Re: Advice
(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)And I think a "no dogpiling rule" can work well in the other direction too. If someone makes a civil and valid complaint and the supporters jumped on them it would also be against the rules.
Either way I just want everyone to be civil and cool with each other.
Re: Advice
(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Advice
(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)* No bad vibes
* Only good thoughts
* Always say the people outwith the community are horrific monsters when they say it is a bad idea
Re: Advice
(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)*If I don't personally want to see something I have the right to make sure the author knows it shouldn't exist because everyone knows the world revolves around me"
*Asking people civil about their criticism and not a dick is the same as saying they're horrible monsters for not liking something.
*I clearly don't know how to read what's been said multiple times, so I'm going to claim the most extreme option.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-06 03:49 am (UTC)(link)"But my vague, useless mockery is so important and needs to be heard!"
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-06 04:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-06 04:33 am (UTC)(link)Thus the "OMG you're being suuuuuuuch a dictator" reaction we've been seeing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-06 07:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: Advice
(Anonymous) 2016-03-05 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)* echo chambers are good.