Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-03-14 07:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #3358 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3358 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[Zootopia]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Zootopia]
__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 093 secrets from Secret Submission Post #480.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Academia question
The question is, could I say "anon came into my inbox and asked "blah blah blah" without citing a link for privacy reasons, but admitting that it's my inbox?
(at this point I'm just wondering, really. Like you say, I'll probably stick to other people's opinions to avoid any issue).
Re: Academia question
(Anonymous) 2016-03-15 01:39 am (UTC)(link)I would just find another source myself if you're unwilling to reveal your Tumblr handle (which I would be myself. My academic peers doesn't need to know all about my fannish interests!)
Re: Academia question
(haha, the first half of my paper is going to be about how trying to do research on tumblr is a shitshow)
Re: Academia question
(Anonymous) 2016-03-15 01:53 am (UTC)(link)I can see how Tumblr is awful as a research platform with the rate a lot of people changes their names. That can be a solution for you though, if you change your name for a little while, source it to that name and then change back later. (Which isn't very ethical imo, but a solution)
Re: Academia question
It's not just the name changes - it's the lack of a central hub to function as a community, the lack of any kind of coherent archiving, and the lack of community "borders" or "members" of any sort. Combine that with the INSANELY high traffic on tags, and I think that it would be almost impossible for someone outside of a specific tumblr fandom to actually do any meaningful research on it without interviewing members left and right.
Re: Academia question
(Anonymous) 2016-03-15 02:27 am (UTC)(link)Yeah, I can see how all of that can make it a very difficult job. I guess a survey could be a way to get meaningful data, but even then you have to be a visible part of the fandom to get any attention.