Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-03-23 07:02 pm
[ SECRET POST #3367 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3367 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #481.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: The power of dick
There is the Omegaverse though, (which sometimes gives a vagina. Sometimes a lubricating asshole. Sometimes something else!) and in TF fandom, the male-coded/designated Transformers are given "valves" by fans which are pretty much vagina analogues. Of course, that's a series where penetration-by-genital isn't already present, but there have been asshole analogues and they aren't as popular. Nor are valve&asshole combos common.
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-23 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)Transformers being given valves that are vaginas for other transformers to penetrate would count as the same thing, adding the ability for penetrative sex
Unless they're eating out valves or something?
Re: The power of dick
That happens, and fingering, and anything else you could do with a vagina. It's not just limited to penetrative sex.
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-23 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)Re: The power of dick
Vaginal Fingering tag: 80 fics
Anal fingering tag: 12 fics
Face-Sitting tag: 42 fics
Blowjobs: 113 fics
Cunnilingus: 57 fics
Oral Sex: 707 fics
Tried to stick to tags that would be fairly indicative of the genitals involved and thus good for comparison. Oral sex tag is included to show the total oral that isn't definitely/genital-specifically tagged.
That's... real thorough.
Re: That's... real thorough.
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-24 12:00 am (UTC)(link)Transformers might be an outlier because its robots and theyre not human to begin with but if it is, its certainly not representative of the norm
Re: The power of dick
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-24 12:06 am (UTC)(link)Im not saying its a good trend mind. But to deny an overall trend exists is simply wron
Re: The power of dick
It might be an outlier. Penetrative sex could be most common, but it's difficult to tell. There's too many alternatives to sticky (robosex with genitals) like PnP, sparksex, tactile, fieldplay, etc while the sticky tag includes any sex where the bots have genitals, whether it's frottage, oral, valve spanking, etc.
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-24 12:11 am (UTC)(link)There's def a trend overall that penetrative sex is default sex. Which is annoying sometimes but it's there. And that lots of people migrate toward it artificially if necessary by adding penetration methods like dicks on female characters makes sense to me given that context
Re: The power of dick
I checked the SPN fandom: 4079 fic results for "Anal Sex" on Ao3. 6849 fic results for "Oral Sex" on Ao3. Are you sure everyone's as gaga for penetration as you think they are?
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-24 12:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: The power of dick
That's either goalpost shifting or poor wording.
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-24 12:20 am (UTC)(link)Re: The power of dick
Not really. It's a way to get a quick look at it, not a graph for a thesis paper :P
If you want to control for certain factors, that's easy enough to do, and anyone is welcome to do it and see if it changes things significantly.
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-24 12:28 am (UTC)(link)"Sex": 14645
It doesn't prove anything for or against the point you're trying to make unless you cherrypick. Taking only Oral (all genders) to Anal (predominantly slash) isn't a good comparison. Also doesn't account for the fact that fics that have anal sex usually also have oral sex in them which isn't the focus or is used as buildup for the "main event"
Re: The power of dick
As opposed to...? There is no perfect method. If there is, feel free to share.
It doesn't prove anything for or against the point you're trying to make unless you cherrypick.
You're assuming I'm trying to prove something. It's just data to analyze.
For SPN:
Anal Sex:
M/M (3909)
F/M (410)
F/F (77)
Oral Sex:
M/M (5830)
F/M (1198)
F/F (207)
Like I said, it's very easy to check the margin of error by gender hookup if you're concerned it's significant. 88% of Anal Sex tagged fics are M/M couples. 80% of Oral Sex tagged fics are M/M couples.
I really don't get you, nonny. You have concerns about the affects of certain factors, but you don't do any work to look into them. Is it lack of curiosity or what?
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-24 01:07 am (UTC)(link)My point here is that without that kind of data, pointing at numbers of those two tags says nothing of consequence since people do not all use the same tagging system or tag their fics the same way. If you search for the tag "sex" many of the top results are ones that do not contain the tag "anal sex" but do contain "top!X" and "bottom!Y" which implies penetration is happening.
Re: The power of dick
2267 of them.
My point here is
Your point is that the data collection has to be perfect, when data collection never is. Researchers can never control for all factors, and it's not always cost-time effective to do so.
You keep complaining about how this factor or that factor potentially affects the data--okay? So? You can either accept that data collection isn't perfectly representative, or you can just...give up on discussing things, I guess. If you're not willing to accept any kind of data assessment, then there's really nothing to discuss.
"top!X" and "bottom!Y" which implies penetration is happening.
No? That's sometimes about power dynamics. Guess we just better give up on trying to collect information or understand fandom's tastes, because of the wild "might be penetrative, might not" Top!X factor.
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-24 01:29 am (UTC)(link)And no, my point isn't that data collection has to be perfect, it's that the data you are presenting me with does not conclusively prove anything to me. But I feel this conversation has ground to a halt.
Re: The power of dick
If that summary is wrong, then by all means say it. But I don't disagree. You did grind the conversation to a halt.
Re: The power of dick
(Anonymous) 2016-03-24 01:39 am (UTC)(link)Again, I'm too lazy to bother more than this, though, since it's going nowhere. Have a nice night and I mean that with no sarcasm. =)