[ SECRET POST #3368 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3368 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 093 secrets from Secret Submission Post #481.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Brussels & Terrorism

[ill_omened]

You don't unfortunately.

They've made their bed, and they have to lie in it. I imagine this'll lead for more cries for more partners in five eyes, and expansion of SSEUR. But the reality is we just can't trust them with it.

Obviously you can offer to have people available to help train and upskill them, but they by all accounts have run investigations borough detectives would be embarrassed to run, let alone federal CT investigations.

The only way it's got this way because of what is for intents and purposes intentional neglect in training, resources, and complacency.

Re: Brussels & Terrorism

[(Anonymous)]

Could you elaborate on what you mean by 'intentional neglect'?

Re: Brussels & Terrorism

[(Anonymous)]

Wouldn't suck NSA and CIA dick.

Re: Brussels & Terrorism

[ill_omened]

Exactly what it means in the broadest of terms.

They have failed to dedicate to the necessary increase in their security apparatus in all terms - personnel, working relationships, technologically, and ability, despite the developing nature of the terrorist threat being abundantly clear to the national police and intelligence community and the threat posed by it.

The linked article touches on a few of the key points.

Re: Brussels & Terrorism

[(Anonymous)]

Who do you think oriented policy towards this end, and for what reason?

Like, incompetence I can grasp, even criminal negligence. The part that's tripping me up is the intentionality.

Re: Brussels & Terrorism

[(Anonymous)]

Failure to remove all social freedoms and privacy from citizens is intentional security negligence. Protection of private thoughts is what leads to public crimes.

Re: Brussels & Terrorism

[ill_omened]

Ah, to clarify I don't think they actually had some greater purpose in allowing themselves to be so incompetent here. I just think that through a complicated confluence of factors leading to their neglect they've allowed it to turn out this way.

It's incompetence and negligence that's put them into a situation where they can't deal with the terror threat posed.

Re: Brussels & Terrorism

[(Anonymous)]

Ah yeah that makes sense fair enough. Thanks for clarifying!

Re: Brussels & Terrorism

[(Anonymous)]

full security lockdown...?

really? authority never thought terrorism are major threats of some kinds (hence problems kept coming for years but.... now civilian like basically involved like in form of speech, debates, discussions....etc. hope nothing big and nasty happen). biased security is also a problem. came of think of it, do you guys realize terrorists KNOW like effing expert on what they are doing...? they are like ruthless....

man, i getting annoyed by writing this, but i just going too anyway...