fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3414 ]

[ SECRET POST #3414 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3414 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

[The Property of Hate Webcomic]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #488.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Again I say "Holy fuckballs! Two people use language the same, very common, way and think the same thing about a secret! Impossible!" But go on and keep accusing me of shit. Case can confirm we're not the same.

Next time try not to make both of your responses within a minute of one another, same anon. It's as tacky as it is obvious.

"Case could tell you we're not!!!" but he won't, which you know he won't, because he doesn't give out IP information.

What's your next spot to daub on the "I was caught same-anoning to troll" bingo card?

No, but he HAS said whether two posters are the same before.

Also: Check the suggestions thread. Confirmed.

Nah, still waiting on confirmation this wasn't the old "comment from my phone" shit that trolls pull to get around IP logging.

But if that is confirmed, I stand corrected! Maybe you two should, like, exchange contact info and become passive-aggressive, trolly, femdom-hating besties. Bonus points for starting the playdate with "I'm sorry, but..."

Confirmed! Congratulations, this is literally the first time I've called same anon and said anons have been willing to put up! I'm genuinely impressed. Every other time the conversation has ~oddly~ died when IP logging was turned on lol.

Edited 2016-05-09 23:32 (UTC)

Congratulations, this is literally the first time I've called same anon and said anons have been willing to put up!

Congratulations, you were wrong for once!

That was more or less the thrust, yeah.

Because it's also totally impossible that two people in the same city would like this place. IRL friends who share common interests? What are those? Hell, when I go home, my Sis and I will end up having posts from he same IP, too. But I know, it's harder to shit on people when you acknowledge that.

Happy to have "impressed" though.

Ignore Ariakas, seriously. She's the most irritating named user on here in my opinion. The number of times I've seen her smugly try and claim that trans people, black people, and other minority fans are basically wrong and playing oppression olympic games when she doesn't like what is being said (usually because they're calling out slash fandom, and we can't have that!) is pretty much off the charts despite her number one go-to response when someone dares question her white, cisgender straight girl ass (usually on slash fans behaving badly and how it's not literally a utopia of progressive ideals and kumbayah around the campfire) is "OMG SO YOU WANT TO VICTIMIZE WOMEN IS THAT IT? SO YOU JUST SPEND ALL YOUR TIME PICKING ON HELPLESS YOUNG TEEN GIRLS!?!?!?"

So....l-o-freaking-l. Thanks for giving me a laugh and standing up to her. I'm glad I'm not the only one who finds her patently obnoxious, or at least I assume I'm in good company considering your comments.

Regarding the actual meat of your post, it's totally cool to not be into femdom. I understand why you were defensive too. There's definitely a counter-culture thing going on within some fetish spaces where women are shamed if they're not into their men being submissive sexually. It seems people are confusing "I want a dominant man sexually" with "I actually want my boyfriend/husband/whatever to be an emotionless robot, and if he cries or otherwise shows weakness he will be unattractive to me". It's cool, if you're not into tying your dude up or pegging him or being a domme, that's completely fine. It sounds like you pehaps jumped the gun a bit, but considering I've seen some conversations on F!S go downhill in pretty much the way you were afraid of, I get it. No reason to hold a grudge. (P.s. This is all coming from a dominant bottom so in case anyone wants to scream "same anon!" again, no, my personal life includes plenty of dominating men and women, I just do it while being the one being penetrated.)

Hahahahah oh maaaaan you're mad. There's more salt here than on all the french fries on the planet. Delicious.

I hope you get diabetes from all the salt.

Heart disease, my dear hater anon. Salt gives you heart disease. Sugar gives you beetus.

Aww, look at that, femanon thinks she's still dominant even while being penetrated. That's adorable.

Also, you're pretty insane.

Aww, look at that, femanon thinks she's still dominant even while being penetrated. That's adorable.

Uh....wow, this is an extremely shitty way to think. That's all I have to say about that. Dominance and submission have zero to do with penetration.

Also, anon never mentioned their gender.

It's what women tell themselves to try and think they're not viewed as worthless fuck holes by men tbh. Men have huge hang ups over being penetrated for a reason.

Lol tell that to all the male doms out there who are cool with getting a vibrator shoved up their ass during a blowjob I guess.

Trying to act like the anon can't be dominant while being penetrated is gross as fuck.

Dominance and submission have zero to do with penetration.

But it kind of does? To the unenlightened at least. Lord knows I've seen plenty of misogynists use "women can only get penetrated so that's why they're weak and inferior" rhetoric. Also the fact that women have to pee sitting down, I've legit seen that used as an example of weakness.

As a female virgin, stuff like this has really messed up my views of sex. It makes me quite sick to the stomach that so many see penetration as inherently weak or that the person being penetrated is lesser/not worthy of respect. I can't bear being seen that way.

I would say to the unenlightened is the part you need to be aware of here. There's nothing inherently submissive about being penetrated, it's all part of the social bullshit we've built up about women. Think about it logically, why is being penetrated weak or submissive? It's a body part, just like any other. The penis doesn't have magic dominating powers. True dominance and submission is about body language, about control, taking it or giving it up. Plenty of dominance and submission play doesn't ever involve penetrative sex of any kind.

I'm sorry to hear you've been affected by all this. I'd say stuff like this is a symptom of our misogynistic, homophobic society and it's not any reflection on an individual and how they wish to seek pleasure. If being penetrated gets you off? You're not weak or submissive for that. And if you don't want to do those things, that's totally fine too.

(Also, re: peeing sitting down, toilets are a modern invention and plenty of places in the world people still stand spread eagle over a hole in the ground and piss into it regardless of gender. How somebody goes to the bathroom is about the most ridiculous thing ever. One stupid comment deserves another though, I'm assuming it was a cis man that said that, tell him every time he shits he's being weak and unmanly because he's allowing a penis-sized shape of crap to be inside his body.)

loll wow. This is the finest essay dedicated to rectal pain I've read on here in a while.

But wait, two can play at this game! I bet you're the same anon that says "Ignore x, they're the worst named user" and then offers up a bunch of misrepresentative platitudes whenever you're disagreeing with any non-anon.

Don't even front. I've seen this against like three named users here in the past week alone.

....What is this even saying?

Misrepresentative platitudes when disagreeing with any non-anon? Can you break this down for me? I know what both of these words mean, but I'm still not sure what you're trying to say. They offer deliberately derailing excuses maybe? Although I don't see what one has to do with another, the status of being "anon" and interacting with non-anons.

You're taking the side of the incredibly obnoxious anon who, when faced with a secret that never once insulted maledom and merely said they want more femdom, reacted with "lol sorry the majority hate weak (already gross mindset on their part that submissive = weak) men OP *smug*"? Seriously?

NA

What? You're putting words in their mouth, they mentioned "sorry the majority enjoy maledom fantasies", they never said anything about submissive men being weak. From everything they (seem) to have been saying (sorry, this thread is wanky and massive and trying to follow accusations of "same-anoning" gives me a headache) it just sounds like they're tired of being told in this community, and this community absolutely has a problem with this, that being a woman and enjoying maledom fantasies are "le problematic" and "violence against women" and "rape apologia", etc. They basically admit this was the reason they jumped the gun if I'm reading correctly and it's the same anon.

They literally said "Sorry if the majority prefers strong men over weak ones" to a secret where OP said they'd like more femdom. You don't interpret that as a needless and bitchy response? Or gross considering they view being submissive as the same with being weak?

People who prefer maledom have no room to complain considering their preference is by and large the default in the vast majority of media. Like, whine when there's actual persecution.

AYRT

Wait, is this an exact quote? The only exact quote I can find is this one:

"I'm sorry the majority of women enjoy maledom fantasies. Sucks to be you and most of the other women on this community, I guess."

I saw nothing about weak men, and there are accusations of same-anoning while there also claim to be two people in this thread who have the same opinions regarding maledom. It's all getting very confusing. It sounds like the comment was in response to the quote that I nabbed?

Also, this community has a tendency to jump on those who enjoy maledom so I can totally see why people are feeling a little snappish. Provided there's no same-anoning going on in this thread and even if there is, this is the largest group of (mostly) women I've ever seen outside of specific femdom spaces who enjoy femdom, and the people who enjoy maledom seem to be vastly in the minority here. It may just have been a case of jumping the gun because of the way past conversations about all this have gone on this community.

Look at the OP of this thread. Click "parent" until you get there, anon.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[ SECRET POST #3414 ]

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

(frozen comment) +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(frozen comment) Re: +1