[ SECRET POST #3420 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3420 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Banana Fish]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #489.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment) Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

You MRA, Bro?

(frozen comment) Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

Are you implying that being a feminist requires not caring about trans* rights?

That's pretty fucking bigoted right there tbh

(frozen comment) Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

What the fuck are you even talking about? Was exactly was in that red pill?

(frozen comment) Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

Germaine Greer is noted for making anti-trans* statements (presumably, this is the root of Feo's objection to her).

You implied that Feo disliking Germaine Greer made Feo an MRA.

Therefore, the conclusion one is forced to draw is that you believe objecting to anti-trans bigotry like Greer's is tantamount to being an MRA. Similarly it would follow that being a feminist is incompatible - in your eyes - with criticizing bigoted statements like the ones Greer made.

(frozen comment) Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

1. Bullshit
2. Utter bullshit.
3. Citation needed for this complete utter bullshit.
4. Even if she's not perfect Germaine Greer is a fucking hero of feminism in it's early days. She doesn't have to be perfect, there are women alive and unraped today because of the stuff she stuck her neck out to do. She took literal bullets for women today and it is fucking bullshit that we turn on her just because she might have grown up with some different values.

(frozen comment) Re: Are they problematic?

[diet_poison]

This is such a weird argument. How is "they might have grown up with different values" an excuse for bigotry when growing up with particular values is what perpetuates bigotry in the first place? You wouldn't let that be a man's excuse for treating women as inferior, would it? No, you'd ask him to take responsibility for his stance even if it's not entirely his fault he has it.