Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-19 06:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #3424 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3424 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #488.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)And now you're going say, ew, they're so ugly.
no subject
More to the point, though, there is no such thing as "objectively good looking".
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-20 03:58 am (UTC)(link)I think "objectively good looking" is basically a way of saying, "If you polled a large group of people, it's extremely likely that a significant percentage of those people would classify said person as good looking." In that context, "objectively good looking" is a useful term.
I describe people as objectively good looking all the time. Chris Hemsworth is the epitome of objectively good looking to me. Which is to say, his looks don't appeal to me in the least, but I still recognize that he has features which make it likely for him to be found good looking by a large percentage of the population.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-20 01:40 am (UTC)(link)I do think Kurt Cobain was quite cute.
Personal taste is a big factor.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)