[ SECRET POST #3429 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3429 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.

__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #490.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: How's your labia?

[(Anonymous)]

OK, well, thanks for busting in here and spreading the idea that girls with longer labia have "a case" for getting it fixed.

Re: How's your labia?

[herpymcderp]

Can you even read?

Re: How's your labia?

[(Anonymous)]

Sorry, I'm not going to continue if you're going to be an asshole.

Re: How's your labia?

[herpymcderp]

You're the one accusing me of things in this thread here, friend. I'm not arbiter of what is considered "long" labia minor by beauty standards. I also said I don't recommend taking that definition to heart.

Anon wanted to know what some people have decided is a standard, and I supplied some information because I happened to be privy to it.

Re: How's your labia?

[blitzwing]

I really don't think that's warranted. Your comment read as uncritical of such a position to me as well. I chose to interpret your words in the most favorable/positive way as possible (giving the benefit of the doubt) but that doesn't mean you're right to imply someone is illiterate for calling out the questionable wording you used.

Re: How's your labia?

[herpymcderp]

My point was more that I said right in my comment I don't personally recommend taking that definition when anon stated I was purposefully "spreading the idea".

I am most definitely not.

Re: How's your labia?

[(Anonymous)]

Your comment read as uncritical of such a position to me as well.

The last sentence of his comment is, "I'm personally not sure it's healthy to take the cosmetic definition as gospel, though." That's...critical of the position.

Re: How's your labia?

[blitzwing]

I can see how it could be read that way. To me it did not seem to be rejecting the idea that certain size labia are ugly. There is no clear denunciation of the idea that labias should be a certain size or appearance in it, just Herpy saying plastic surgeon's ideal labias shouldn't be taken as fact.

Re: How's your labia?

[(Anonymous)]

I might agree if the phrase "not healthy" wasn't in there. That's a pretty clear negative judgment of the position.

Re: How's your labia?

[herpymcderp]

As it was meant to be. Thank you, anon.

Re: How's your labia?

[blitzwing]

Maybe I would too if he hadn't said "I'm not sure". I take that as a neutral stance; neither confirming nor denying. It simply introduces the possibility that the stance may be wrong: it doesn't argue that it IS wrong.

A critical response would be "You shouldn't take a personal surgeon's definition as gospel".

Re: How's your labia?

[(Anonymous)]

I disagree. I think an uncritical response wouldn't introduce any kind of doubt or implication that the stance is unhealthy. It would just present the stance without comment.

Re: How's your labia?

[(Anonymous)]

I get having issues with this particular user, but that is not what they said at all. They never implied there was "a case" for anything.

Re: How's your labia?

[blitzwing]

Yeah, they didn't imply it. They said it. " At least... enough to warrant a good case for surgical alteration (or so I'm told)."