case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-06-17 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #3453 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3453 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________













03. [SPOILERS for SnK]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Shadowhunters]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Attack On Titan/Shingeki no Kyojin]



__________________________________________________












06. [WARNING for RL family death]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for RL underage sex]

[Lori Maddox, Sable Starr]


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for incest]

[Wynonna Earp]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #493.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-17 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
i wish i could reconcile how much I like Bowie and his music with how gross it is that he statutory raped a girl.
I just ugh. i don't know man. i don't know.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-17 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
At least that was consensual, and she was okay with it.

Jimmy Page, on the other hand, kidnapped her, and I still find him pretty gross for that.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
It was pretty gross, but Lori was also okay with the kidnapping and she frames it as the great romance of her life.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
How are the two hard to reconcile? There's nothing that makes it impossible for someone to both commit statutory rape, and to create amazing music and have very appealing and positive other aspects to his personality. In fact, a lot of statutory rapists are incredibly charming and appealing, and it's not always just a fake mask covering up a nasty real personality - that's part of the reason why underage teenagers want to bang them so much.

People can be complex and multi-faceted, and that complexity extends to people who have done horrible things too, not just people on the good side of the spectrum. It's a dangerous mistake to believe all rapists are nothing but degenerates who are just pretending to be good guys to lure in strangers. That's the kind of thinking that causes people to go "No way, X could NEVER be a rapist! I KNOW him! He's not that kind of person!"

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
i think there's a line between, say, having offensive opinions or something, and assaulting a teenager.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Um, when in my comment did I say having offensive opinions was in any way equivalent to assaulting a teenager? Or mention offensive opinions at all?

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I think that was also at the beginning of the period when he was high out of his mind most of the time.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
Wasn't it also said that he didn't know she was underage? If I'm in a bar I'm going to assume everyone there is of age.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 10:21 am (UTC)(link)
She allegedly also had a fake ID, so there was no way he could have known.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 11:16 am (UTC)(link)
That is a bad idea.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I know they have a lot of heavy makeup on in the picture, but they still look like young teens.

Like, I get not knowing someone is underage even though they're at a bar, but both of them looked really young.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-18 02:47 pm (UTC)(link)
"Young teens"
No. No they really don't. Older teens maybe. Young teens? Absolutely not.
otakugal15: (Default)

[personal profile] otakugal15 2016-06-18 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, no, they look like they are at least 17 or 18 years old in that picture.

That is not young teen.