Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-07-10 04:57 pm
[ SECRET POST #3476 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3476 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #497.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
If you're writing historical fiction about, for example, pre-colonial Africa... if there's white people in it, you're doing it wrong.
Or say there's a story set in Japan, which is 98% Japanese... what are you going to expect to find there? Here's a hint: PROBABLY NOT PUERTO RICANS.
Not every place is multicultural.
Now, when you start talking about fantasy settings, like Dragon Age the Witcher, then you might have a leg to stand on.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)Just seems natural to me that if you were writing a story on the Amish community a part of it would have to include how they deal with outsiders.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-11 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)Japan was unified in the 16th century and was isolationist for a few hundred centuries. Before then there was significant cultural contact with China and Korea including importing at least four different waves of Buddhism, not all of which were peaceful adoptions.
Any significant multicultural work (such as Okorafor's Lagoon) is going to take into account how those issues are different from place to place rather than inserting "Puerto Ricans" everywhere.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-11 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-11 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)