Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-08-03 05:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #3500 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3500 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eghk9bVNN9M ]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Impractical Jokers (R-L): Joe, Q, Sal, Murr]
__________________________________________________
04.

[American Gods]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Pretty Little Liars]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Doctor Who]
__________________________________________________
07.

[A Game of Thrones, Littlefinger/Sansa]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Brie Larson vs. Alison Brie]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #500.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: fandom pet peeves
Seeing LGBTQ tags filled with politicized ship wank. Your headcanon is not my political crisis.
Re: fandom pet peeves
Re: fandom pet peeves
Thank you. You put it into words!
Re: fandom pet peeves
"Lesbian ___ is bi erasure!"
"Bi ___ is lesbophobia!"
"But ___ is obviously trans!"
Re: fandom pet peeves
I'd love to see who goes in this blank. Lars, maybe?
Re: fandom pet peeves
Of course, I have a troubled teen nephew who changed his preferred name frequently. I'm not opposed to that headcanon but it's not mine.
Re: fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2016-08-04 01:33 am (UTC)(link)This can be true, but it is also true that there are quite a lot of batshit nutcases out there who willfully project their own insane assumptions onto various things that they like, and refuse to accept that they could possibly be mistaken about what the creator intended.
sa
(Anonymous) 2016-08-04 01:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: fandom pet peeves
ayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-08-04 03:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: ayrt
Not to mention, artists generally don't get paid for having good ideas. They're paid for the long and grueling process of developing the best %1 of the many ideas in their massive notebooks and sketchbooks for the audience. Having good ideas doesn't make much of a difference if you can't deliver on them. It's great that the Wachowski sisters are fluent in religious philosophy and queer theory. But damn do they need an editor when it comes to bringing that to the screen.
EDIT: They're much better at expressing the queer theory than the religious philosophy.
Re: fandom pet peeves
Also quite accurate, sadly.