case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-29 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #3526 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3526 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Feed The Birds, from Mary Poppins]


__________________________________________________



03.
(Once Upon A Time)


__________________________________________________



04.
[ Dota 2 esport ]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Great British Bake Off, series 3]


__________________________________________________



06. http://i.imgur.com/82bEEum.png
[The Private Report on My Lesbian Experience with Loneliness; linked for nudity/implied porn, illustrated]


__________________________________________________



07.
[We Happy Few]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Stranger Things]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #504.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-08-29 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I was actually about to start a writing thread because I have a question. You beat me to it.

When exactly do you label something dubcon? I'm currently working on a fic. It is very clearly rape, so I'm labeling it non-con. But the whole thrust of the fic is this scenee where the perpetrator, who has previously been violent with the victim, works to break the victim by making him think that he wanted it just because the perpetrator makes it enjoyable and the victim's body reacts (the characters are Sauron and Maedhros if that matters).

So since that's the theme of the fic, I'm not sure if that counts as dubcon since I don't really understand what dubcon is, and I'm not sure if I should use the label or not.
iwasanartist: (Default)

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

[personal profile] iwasanartist 2016-08-29 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd stick with non-con. To me, dubcon is best used when there's an external force influencing one or more of the people with no malicious intent from anyone. So, drunkenness, sex pollen, fuck or die, that sort of thing. Not so much the gaslighting that this sounds like.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-08-29 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, okay, cool. I just wasn't even sure what dubcon really means. That makes sense. Yes, this is absolutely gaslighting by a villain who tries to break his victims in every way possible.

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

(Anonymous) 2016-08-29 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe "Dub-con/Non-con" as one tag, to indicate that it could be read either way? With also "victim blaming", "forced consent"?

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

(Anonymous) 2016-08-29 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Also, tag it with "Gaslighting" or some variation thereof as per aiwasanartist's comment.

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

(Anonymous) 2016-08-29 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I've gotten to where I tag everything like that noncon because that's what it would be in real life, right? And frankly, I don't want dubcon fans reading my stuff because they'll just whine and bitch at me if it gets too heavy for them.
sarillia: (Default)

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

[personal profile] sarillia 2016-08-29 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Dubcon and non-con are both rape, they're just different ways of it playing out. The way I see it, dubcon is when there's some kind of consent but that consent is compromised in some way.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-08-29 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, that's good to know. I think I'm going to stick with non-con here because the compromised consent doesn't happen until the victim is close to orgasming, then at that point he asks for it. But before that he clearly says no and the perpetrator tells him he isn't allowed to say no.

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

(Anonymous) 2016-08-29 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, this. Dub-con and non-con are both rape, legally and ethically speaking, but are indicators in fanfic to describe how the rape is happening.

I would label something dub-con when they are pressured into consenting for sex, or seem to somewhat be into it which the story focuses on, or whatever. Still rape, but it hairsplits a fanfic subgenre imo which is only relevant in the fanfic world.

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

[personal profile] mrs_don_draper 2016-08-29 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Non-con because even if the victim thinks it's dub, the rapist knows it isn't. To me, dubcon is when *both* the characters are in a morally grey area.

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

(Anonymous) 2016-08-29 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
The way I've always understood noncon and dubcon is that noncon is without consent, and dubcon is when consent is, well, dubious.

A situation where someone is unwilling to admit they want to fuck the other one because they're embarrassed or think being gay is wrong, for example, is dubious. If the character is pushed into it while resisting, it's still rape because consent wasn't given to the rapist, but it wasn't that the willingness was missing, the consent was held back due to other reasons. Dub-con is when consent and willingness are somehow at odds with each other or unclear.

Manipulating and breaking the victim into consenting when they never wanted to consent in the first place is straight up non-con.

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

(Anonymous) 2016-08-30 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
SA

So for example, a person who doesn't want to admit they're gay and totally want to fuck the other guy, being pressured into gay sex, is dub-con. The willingness is there but the consent isn't.

On the other hand, a person who doesn't want to fuck the other person consenting to having sex with them for some other reason - sex or die, aliens made them do it, et cetera - while still not really wanting to have sex with them, is also dub-con because the consent is there but the willingness isn't.

philstar22: (Default)

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-08-30 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks, that's helpful. This is definately of the perpetrator knows it is not consensual and is messing with the victim variety. It was clearly non-con in my mind, I just didn't know if I should include the dub-con label because someone else might see it that way. But clearly it isn't dub-con, so I won't use that.

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

(Anonymous) 2016-08-30 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Assuming the victim isn't attracted to the perpetrator and doesn't want to have sex with him before the incident or you know, something like that, sounds definitely like non-con to me. It'd be dub-con if he secretly were in love with him and wanted stuff to happen but felt it was "wrong" or something, but it doesn't sound like that! I'm pretty sure everyone will get its noncon.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Dubcon?-- Probably trigger warnings here for rape

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-08-30 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
He's only attracted to him in the sense of the perpetrator is very, very attractive and happens to have taken on a form that looks kind of like the person the victim does love. But he knows who the perpetrator is and very much doesn't want it, he's just at his breaking point.