Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-09-10 03:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #3538 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3538 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 56 secrets from Secret Submission Post #506.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Fantasy or sci-fi living?
I ain't got time to write a thesis.
Re: Fantasy or sci-fi living?
(Anonymous) 2016-09-10 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)I don't think that characterization is representative of the genre's roots, nor do I think it's intrinsic to the genre from a theoretical point of view. Which is what I took you to be saying, and that's kind of why I asked what the fuck you were talking about.
Re: Fantasy or sci-fi living?
I don't think it's ALL there is to it, but holy shit is there a lot of it to go around. Like, for instance, there is a buttload of Russian sci fi that is essentially, "this is why communism is awesome, science says so, we will create the perfect race of workers and take over the universe".
But really I don't have time for a huge thesis considering other people have already done a way better job of characterizing it.
Re: Fantasy or sci-fi living?
(Anonymous) 2016-09-10 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)But the question is, what does that have to do with the theoretical and aesthetic characteristic of each genre. The point that I'm trying to make by bringing up Frankenstein is that science fiction as a genre and a mode is not necessarily implicated in the particular traits that you outlined there, from a genre aesthetics point of view. And I still don't see where you're drawing that link, or more specifically, what that has to do with the claim that, going into the history and theoretics of each genre, they are drastically different in terms of the stakes they set up and the logic they work by.
Re: Fantasy or sci-fi living?
Absolutely. Historically, this is true. However, I'm not sure it's true by current genre standards... in the same way as current genre standards also don't comply with past standards for social commentary re: race/gender issues.
See what I'm saying?
Re: Fantasy or sci-fi living?
(Anonymous) 2016-09-10 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)I still disagree, in the sense that I don't think it's at all true that current genre standards actually have dissolved the historical-theoretical-aesthetic differences between science fiction and fantasy. But I strongly doubt we're going to make any headway at all on that one.
Re: Fantasy or sci-fi living?
I was just having fun talking about fiction though, so. Thanks!
(frozen comment) Re: Fantasy or sci-fi living?