[ SECRET POST #3540 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3540 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Tom Hanks & Aaron Eckhart in Sully]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Star Trek: The Next Generation]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Hobbit (film)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Keeping Up Appearances]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Endeavour]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Legend, Lily/Darkness]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Anne of Green Gables remake]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Macross Delta]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #506.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think any visual remake of Anne of Green Gables is meaningless in this day and age. The idea of red hair being considered unattractive is laughable, even if you know that's how it was at the time the story was written. Now it's just an easy way to have a "homely" main character who's anything but, in the audience's view. And it doesn't help that the new actress is otherwise very pretty all around.

[(Anonymous)]

The old actress was also very pretty. I don't think changed attitudes about red hair makes the remake meaningless. It's a period piece. People generally understand that in a non-contemporary setting, attitudes about many things were different than attitudes now. Fashions and hairstyles are different, settings look different, modes of transportation aren't the same as modern modes of transportation, etc. etc. It doesn't (and shouldn't) stop anyone from making new adaptations of say, Jane Austen novels, or historical events, or anything that isn't set in 2016. Your remark doesn't make a whole lot of sense.