[ SECRET POST #3546 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3546 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #507.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Well, think about it. The smartest characters have to die, or else they'd just solve the problem without panicking and causing drama.

[feotakahari]

Reminds me of that Dungeons and Dragons movie that killed the cleric first, because magical healing would have solved a lot of problems. I guess when you're in a horror movie, being intelligent is a magical power all of its own.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, exactly. All the scientists and doctors and medics and whatnot dying, with regard to plot, are part of the disaster that the main characters are in. If people who would help solve the problem were still around, then it's not as drastic a problem.

[sarillia]

I don't see what intelligence has to do with not panicking. I'm both smart and an easily startled coward.

[(Anonymous)]

If you're both smart and an easily startled coward who can't calm down to think through a life threatening problem I wouldn't call you the smartest character. Not trying to insult you. I would call you "a smart character" but not "the smartest" in any applicable sense to resolving the disaster situation. My point was that in order for disasters to continue and be dire, the people who can solve the problem have to have plot deaths.

[sarillia]

I think we're looking at intelligence differently. I don't think "the smartest characters" and "the people who can solve the problem" are always the same.

I agree with your main point though that people who would be able to solve the problem too quickly need to be taken out of the plot.

[(Anonymous)]

In evidence: the Healing Cock. (There's probably a smart one out there, but that's the exception to the rule.)

[(Anonymous)]

SA

Plus, street smarts are a thing. As is cunning. Emotional intelligence. Spacial reasoning and theory. It's not only standard "intelligence" and book knowledge I'm talking about when I say smart.

[sarillia]

I'm including those things in various kinds of intelligence because there's no good noun form of "smart".

[(Anonymous)]

...I would think "smarts" is a good noun form, which has a lot more to do with practical effectiveness than "intelligence" which is far more academic? I didn't use "most intelligent" for a reason since often the smartest characters in horror movies aren't necessarily the most intelligent ones.

This is a pedantic argument I don't particularly want to continue though.

[sarillia]

Yeah we're clearly just going around in circles with our different connotations of intelligence.

[(Anonymous)]

I think people tend to define intelligence as their best native qualities. :D Nothing wrong with that, since it's all intelligence.

[(Anonymous)]

This thread is giving me deja vu.I could swear I've read this exact exchange on FS before.