case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-18 03:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #3546 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3546 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #507.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
world_eater: (Default)

[personal profile] world_eater 2016-09-19 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
well here's the thing: if you ask people to warn for squicks they can refuse and tell you to just unfollow. if they refuse trigger warning they're the scum of the earth and free to be harassed because WOW, what if someone just stumbles on their content and gets triggered?

you make warnings a moral choice instead of a personal one. bingo.
Edited 2016-09-19 08:42 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2016-09-19 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
So basically the people who want ketchup but not tomatoes on their burgers because they're allergic to tomatoes?