[ SECRET POST #3571 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3571 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 20 secrets from Secret Submission Post #510.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, because in Ireland during the height of their 'troubles', the terrorists, on both sides, were Muslims.
Because every single shooting rampage in the USA- which I would fit into the category of 'terrorist attack' (isn't the point of a 'terrorist attack' to cause terror?) is not a white guy but a Muslim.
Because the USA, going into Southern America and bombing countries, violently ousting democratically elected leaders etc (which I would say fits the definition of 'terror attack'.) that's somehow to do with Muslims.
Did you know that in WW2 America firebombed Japan? Robert Mcnamara has admitted to his guilt over the thousands of people who died, not soldiers, civilians. I would argue, even though it was during war, that was a terrorist attack (just as the Japanese bombing Pearl Harbour was a terrorist attack).
Hey, neither of these were 'Muslims'.
Because Timothy Mcveigh was Muslim.
Because the scientist, who killed people using anthrax, after September 11, was so clearly Muslim.
The list goes on...

[(Anonymous)]

The list goes on but I could double that list with just what ISIS has been doing over the past couple of years.

And you are aware the deadliest shooting rampage in the US was a Muslim who pledged allegiance to ISIS right?

[(Anonymous)]

And you are aware the deadliest shooting rampage in the US was a Muslim who pledged allegiance to ISIS right?

What exactly do you think this proves

[(Anonymous)]

You know what? I fucking dare you to tally every single atrocity Daesh has committed against every death and piece of destruction the US caused in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Go on. I dare you.

If that's not enough, I fucking dare you to tally every single death and horror caused by Daesh, Al-Qaeda, and Hamas COMBINED, vs. the Holocaust.

Want another? Let's try Daesh vs. Manifest Destiny.

Shall I keep going?

[(Anonymous)]

Not to take away from what you're saying, but I do agree with you, but terrorism is actually defined as using violence and intimidation for political reasons. So basically while, for example, the Columbine shooters and the Oklahoma City bomber both committed acts of terror, only the Oklahoma City bomber did it for political reasons, thus only he would be considered a terrorist.

Sorry again not to derail or anything (because as I said I agree with you), just was more replying to your "isn't the point of a terrorist act to cause terror?".