[ SECRET POST #3575 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3575 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #511.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

When I see things like that I think of the pearl-clutching TOTALLY TRUE post how someone's four year old got on their computer and looked up My Little Pony and saw PONY PORN and was so traumatized by it and cried for months.

A. Why does your four year old have unsupervised computer access?
B. Unless you misspell something (Like a F!S commenter who mentioned typo-ing "Unicorn horn tutorial" to "unicorn porn tutorial" ) google images is very good about filtering porny pony stuff and even with safe search off it takes a lot of scrolling before you find something sexual in the general MLP search terms.
C. If your child cries for months at seeing standard cartoon porn there is something VERY VERY BAD going on in your house that you shouldn't blame on the internet. There's a reason most of the inappropriate things kids say tend to be related to kids having no clue what's sexual.


Though on the topics people are discussing, yeaaah hijacking posts with your kink are rude. At the same time I also get really sick of the double standard where I see people post "This is a ANTAGONISTIC Kylo Ren fighting Rey picture, NOT shippy. Reylo is GROSS and ABUSIVE and if you tag it Reylo you need help." and then turn around and reblog something platonic with Rey and Finn with "TRU LOVE SandStorm is <3 <3 <3 they are SO IN LOVE she's had 20 babies by him and they're all beautiful <3 uwu " Like the people who complain the loudest about it are the ones most likely to do it with their kinks/ships.

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

Did you mean to imply that interracial couples are inherently kinky, like incest, noncon, etc., or did you just not think that comparison through?

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

Did you mean to overlook the fact I said shipping as well as kinks?

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

And yet the entire discussion thus far has been exclusively about kinks. Unfortunate.

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

how did you bend yourself over backwards to get that out of this.

"this picture is not shippy, don't tag it with your ship!!!! /reblogs something pointedly not-shippy with commentary about their own ship" is the behavior previous anon was talking about.

you are trying real hard to be offended

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

So you're saying that previous anon deliberately went off topic to rant about people being hypocritical about tagging fanart instead of talking about kinks like everyone else in the entire thread? Sounds like a stretch.

Either that, or you think previous anon's a fucking dumbass who hijacks threads randomly so they can complain about fanart tags. That's kind of harsh on your part, don't you think?

Re: Rant

[diet_poison]

NAYRT

So you're saying that previous anon deliberately went off topic to rant about people being hypocritical about tagging fanart

Dude, going off-topic in thread happens literally all the time, so yes, I think that's what happened.

You are reaching really, really hard here.

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

Yikes. That's what I thought at first, but you are literally never right about this stuff. Maybe next time original anon should just double-check for "unfortunate implications" before they hit 'Post.'

Re: Rant

[diet_poison]

I'm not even sure what to make of this comment. What stuff? Assertions made by anons about other anons' intentions? How would anyone know if I'm "literally [never]" right, unless one person is literally every single anon I've ever made such an assertion about?

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

Anything that involves other people's emotions and anything involving more than the shallowest level of reading comprehension is just not in your wheelhouse. If it's not offensive to you, specifically, then it couldn't possibly be offensive to anyone. It's probably not your fault, and your empathy deficiency doesn't keep you from being a lovely person most of the time. But it does make your judgement pretty unreliable when it comes to whether or not someone has said or done something hurtful to anyone other than you.

Re: Rant

[diet_poison]

I can't tell if you're trolling or not and probably shouldn't respond, but do you have examples? Like is this a pattern you have been noticing of me specifically or are you mad about a particular thread?