case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-03-06 06:25 pm

[ SECRET POST #3715 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3715 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #531.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-03-06 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I haven't seen this movie, so I can't comment on it specifically, but I get the general sentiment. Sometimes it seems like people go for the easy, low-hanging fruit to poke fun at Christianity. There's a lot to critique about that religion, and some people can do it better than others.

(That's one reason I love it whenever Stephen Colbert tackles religion. He has a deep understanding of the religion as a whole and can bring a thoughtful critique to the topic.)
sarillia: (Default)

[personal profile] sarillia 2017-03-07 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed on Colbert. I've been watching a ton of clips of him lately.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2017-03-07 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Slightly OT, but I just realized that I haven't seen a fictional critique of the Prosperity Gospel more recent than Fun With Dick and Jane in 1977. It seems like a prime target.