case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-04-07 05:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #3747 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3747 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________










04. [SPOILERS for Smallville, X-men films]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for The Discovery]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Inferno]



__________________________________________________










07. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

[Broadchurch]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for rape?? probably?? in some of these]

[Dramatical Murder]


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of rape]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of rape/incest (though not actually depicted)]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for discussion of rape]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #534.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] fscom 2017-04-07 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)
06. [SPOILERS for Inferno]
http://i.imgur.com/vrADsrA.jpg

(Anonymous) 2017-04-07 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh. To be fair, the movies are probably more watchable than the books are readable - they still have the dumb plot twists, but if you can see that coming, at least you don't have to deal with the prose.

And hey, there are worse reasons to want to watch things.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-07 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Dan Brown is a notoriously terrible writer who somehow keeps getting published. Who else is in that category? Ludlum?

(Anonymous) 2017-04-07 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Never have I so strongly wanted to red pencil a professional novel. His writing style was that painful.
were_lemur: (Default)

[personal profile] were_lemur 2017-04-08 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
VINDICATION!

(Seriously, one of my friends called me a snob because I said the exact same thing. I tried to explain to her that editing my own work had trained me to see the flaws everywhere, but I don't think she really believed me.)

(Anonymous) 2017-04-08 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
People like that annoy me a little. I think it's because they're unable to detect any flaws, so that means there aren't any - or at least, no appreciable amount. Anyone who claims to see flaws has to be wrong or snobby, because they can't admit that such people are catching more mistakes than they are.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2017-04-07 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I read Digital Fortress once. I'd say the author it reminds me of most is Eric Van Lustbader, although Lustbader has a lot more sex. You could also compare Richard K. Morgan, but he at least has some idea of how to structure a paragraph.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-07 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a buttload of authors like that, and they're quite easy to find if you look around for instance an airplane bookstore; Brown is notable mostly for the fact that, for some reason, the world decided to take him really seriously for a year or two.
otakugal15: (Default)

[personal profile] otakugal15 2017-04-07 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
The book was ten times better. I HATED how they just...shied away from the morally grey ethics ending of the book.

His writing style is generic, but I liked that ending.