case: ([ Ryohei; DINOSAURS. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-05-21 05:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #502 ]


⌈ Secret Post #502 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.


__________________________________________________



45.


__________________________________________________



46.


__________________________________________________



47.


__________________________________________________



48.


__________________________________________________



49.


__________________________________________________



50.


__________________________________________________



51.


__________________________________________________



52.


__________________________________________________



53.


__________________________________________________



54.


__________________________________________________



55.


__________________________________________________



56.


__________________________________________________



57.


__________________________________________________



58.


__________________________________________________



59.


__________________________________________________



60.


__________________________________________________



61.


__________________________________________________



62.


__________________________________________________



63.


__________________________________________________



64.


__________________________________________________



65.


__________________________________________________



66.
[lol self-secret, check the pencil, whee]


__________________________________________________



67.


__________________________________________________



68.


__________________________________________________



69.


__________________________________________________



70.


__________________________________________________



71.


__________________________________________________



72.


__________________________________________________



73.


__________________________________________________



74.


__________________________________________________



75.


__________________________________________________



76.


__________________________________________________



77.


__________________________________________________



78.


__________________________________________________



79.


__________________________________________________



80.


__________________________________________________



81.


__________________________________________________



82.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 173 secrets from Secret Submission Post #072.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 1 2 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't care if the op dislikes the show; that's their business. But obviously the two actors can carry the show or the network wouldn't have renewed it for a fourth season.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-21 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Re:icon - Not angry. Totally calm. I just don't see the "WUT" factor.

I don't really care whether they are or aren't carrying it. The fact that the show's been renewed doesn't make the secret "WUT" worthy. What does renewal prove? That ratings are good and there's some kind of plot to come? That's good, but it doesn't mean that a cast like that is going to keep things fresh or interesting for much longer.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm impressed that you think my "WUT" comment was unworthy. I've always been in need of someone to clean up my random internet comments and keep things orderly. I'm MOST PLEASED you seem so willing to accept the job. I can't promise dental coverage, but you'll be treated on trips to the most exotic and far-reaching corners of LJ.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
Wow, you're getting all pissy over "WUT"? Allow me to ask... HZUH?!

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
Nobody's pissy here, nonny! We're all ~friends~.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
Oh. I was just using your method of interpreting online "speech"... sorry, I got all sorts of confused. Thanks for clearing the air, mousy! MUAH! KISSES!

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
ILU too. ♥

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-21 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
the cause of renewal isn't that the show's any good at all, it's for money. supernatural makes the network money because a bunch of brainless fangirls think the actors are hot.

if what is or is not renewed actually meant anything, how do you explain the cancellation if tv shows universally critically and fan acclaimed (arrested development), but the continuation of cheap brain-candy that either has hack writers or no writers at all, like reality shows.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
supernatural makes the network money because a bunch of brainless fangirls think the actors are hot.

.... How exactly is that the two actors NOT carrying the show, then? A big part of an actor's job is to appeal to the viewers in some way or other and make the network money. If they're both doing that successfully enough for the network, how are they not carrying the show?

I have no opinion on critically and fan acclaimed shows, canceled or otherwise. Supernatural is the only show I watch, and I'm perfectly happy admitting that the one hour per week that I spend in front of the boob tube is filled with eye-candy and often silly plots. It's my weekly escapism and that's how I prefer it. Anyone else is free to enjoy their escapism in other ways.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-21 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
then stop acting surprised when people DO feel free to enjoy their escapism in other ways. like with good shows :O

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
*sigh* Did you actually READ any of my comments? I'm not surprised nor am I acting surprised that someone doesn't like the show. I'm expressing disagreement on the comment of the actors not carrying the show. Lord, I'm feeling like a broken record over this point.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-21 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
then don't say things you don't mean, like, for instance:

WUT

you are also probably the only person i have ever seen anywhere who uses network execs as a judge of what is good or not. so congratulations on being the biggest idiot of the day.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Good grief. I did mean WUT in reference to:

I'm expressing disagreement on the comment of the actors not carrying the show.


Although, apparently the mice seem to interpret WUT as some sort of screaming from the mountain-top in indignation, which it is not. I also never said anything about any show being good or bad. I just said that obviously the network thinks that the two actors are carrying the show. Hold onto that crown and save it for your reading for context skills.

And that's it. I'm done repeating the same things over and over again, clearly and concisely, only to have them continually misread and misinterpreted.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
WUT WUT

WUT

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
... in the butt?

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] hotfuzz85.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 07:44 am (UTC)(link)
ILU

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-22 12:01 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] hotfuzz85.livejournal.com - 2008-05-22 12:09 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
. Supernatural is the only show I watch, and I'm perfectly happy admitting that the one hour per week that I spend in front of the boob tube is filled with eye-candy and often silly plots.

Somehow, I am extremely unsurprised. If you just admitted the plots are ridiculous (and thus probably stupid) and the guys are eye-candy (and thus aren't really there to act) why are you so surprised by the secret? Some of us like shows where the actors may not be as attractive, but they can act and the plots don't have huge, gaping holes.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
1) I did not say the plots are ridiculous nor that they are stupid. I said often silly, which is not the same thing.

2) As for all of your other statements, I will refer you to any one of my other comments in this post. They address all of this quite simply, including the fact that I am
not surprised
by the secret.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry you're in denial. :)

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
In denial of what, exactly? The fact that:

1) I know what words I used before; or
2) I ... know what words I used before? D:

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
That the plots are ridiculous, the leads are prettyboys, and that you've already undermined any argument you might make that it has any sort of substance or redeeming value whatsoever. :)

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
Well, you're entitled to think the plots are ridiculous, just as I'm entitled to have the opinion of my choosing on the subject. I quite clearly did not say one way or the other on that one. I merely corrected your comment earlier that I had not said they were ridiculous; I didn't comment that they are or are not ridiculous. I just said often silly. You're arguing over your own misinterpretation, just like all the other lazy and spineless anonymice that came before you. The only thing you have going for you that's new is the passive-aggressive smilies.

I already said they were eye-candy. That's not denial about them being prettyboys.

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
I protest! I'm am quite productive! ... most of the time. And you clearly have so much work to do that you're overwhelmed as well. :)

I like passive-aggressive smilies. They look cute and happy. :D :D

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com - 2008-05-22 02:09 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-22 02:16 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dubiously.livejournal.com - 2008-05-22 02:29 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dementedjen.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
1. Since when are you the begin all and end all of defining good television?
2. Since when are people that are goodlooking of "prettyboys" untalented?
3. Why are you so freaking angry about this show?

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) 2008-05-22 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
It's on the CW, BB. Home to sucky television and pretty men. Sorry to break it to you.

I'm not mad! I'm quite pleased, actually. This is way more entertainment than your fandom has provided in months. :)

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dementedjen.livejournal.com - 2008-05-22 14:29 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 79

(Anonymous) - 2008-05-22 12:02 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: 79

[identity profile] dementedjen.livejournal.com - 2008-05-22 14:21 (UTC) - Expand