case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-04-29 04:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #3769 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3769 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Dragon Ball franchise]


__________________________________________________



03.
(Overwatch, Hanzo Shimada)


__________________________________________________



04.
[Undertale]


__________________________________________________



05.
[King of Prism/Pretty Rhythm: Rainbow Live]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Rosario Dawson)


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Adventure Zone]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor in Batman vs. Superman]


__________________________________________________


09.
[Supernatural]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 60 secrets from Secret Submission Post #540.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
post 'em

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
The way some fandom gets so over precious about always being nice. Sometimes, if you want a comm to remain active, you gotta have the freedom to tell a dozy fucker to kill themselves and not have your post deleted, froze, or doxxed to the local fuzz by some snooping bastard fucker.

Also please stop using US police ranks in the UK centred fandoms unless you are writing a Dempsey and Makepeace fic.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
You don't have to tell people to kill themselves to tell them to fuck off

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 21:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 21:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh, I don't agree that personal attacks are necessary for a community to thrive. I've known a lot of communities that were fine with that rule and have plenty of discussion (and usually the trolls just need to get creative to stay within the rules.)

I do think that fandom needs more welcome debate to thrive though. In recent years I've seen a lot of backlash towards any negative opinion at all (not a personal attack, but like a critique of a book/show/movie/etc) and anyone who is negative is labeled a "hater" even if they really like said fandom. Now that is the type of shit I think needs to stop, if you don't want to debate or critique, then stay out of the convo but let fans discuss.

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] morieris - 2017-04-29 22:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
If you get in trouble for telling someone to kill themself, you have no one to blame but yourself, really.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, please. Yodeling fuckmuppets who can't stretch the wizened rat turd they call a brain to think of any response to a comment they don't like beyond "go kill yourself" are the real cancer that's killing fandom.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
No.

Just no.

It's not "precious about being nice" it's basic human decency. If your "pet peeve" is that you can't freely tell people to commit suicide that says more about you than anything else.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 15:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 17:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
People on "fandom" friendzies who don't actually do or care about anything fandomy.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
This sentence confuses me and I don't know if it's because I'm tired.
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] morieris 2017-04-29 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
When you're watching something specifically for someone and all the gifs are about everyone else.

like I can make gifs but real people come out terribly.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)
'Stimboards' are the worst thing I have ever experienced in my life.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 21:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] morieris - 2017-04-29 22:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:21 (UTC) - Expand

nayrt

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 06:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 10:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I am so turned off when a post will be about Character A, and then right at the end, the OP will slip in a dig about Character B (or pairing A and bashing pairing B). It has nothing to do with the rest of the post. I just want someone to write meta or squee about a character on his or her own without it being at the expense of another character. It always leaves me feeling a little less love for the original Character (or pairing) A.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
The idea that if you don't like shippy fic, you hate romance. Or should just go read gen.

Maybe I want something in between shippy and gen...?

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 21:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 21:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] skeletal_history - 2017-04-29 23:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 00:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2017-04-30 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
The shift towards politics and the absolute bullshit and ridiculous wank that happens from people badly applying political theories while trying to one up and prove their moral righteous to their peers. I'm in fandom to relax, so I don't really give a shit about your politics and I honest to god don't believe that shipping or racebending is in anyway shape or form actual political activism.

Yeah, I've heard all the arguments before. "the personal is political so" (haha no this shit affects me too that's why I don't want hear anymore about it especially from idiots who have a half-assed understanding of what's actually going on) and "fandom used to really bigoted" (maybe, but this obsession with ideological purity and lack of understanding that fiction =/= reality puts actual Crusades to shame)

Any why is every profile now a glorified a/s/l list? Don't you guys have anything actually interesting about you, because your sexual orientation sure ain't.

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] morieris - 2017-04-29 21:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] morieris - 2017-04-29 22:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 10:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 11:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 18:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 17:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:59 (UTC) - Expand
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Satsuki)

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] morieris 2017-04-29 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
"DDLG / INCEST SHIPPERS / REYLO FANS DO NOT LIKE/REBLOG/INTERACT"

I hate what I just listed as well but you're naive as shit if you think that will stop anyone.

If they reblog it and add offensive personal attacks, absolutely, but if they like it and you throw some kind of fit about it...geeze.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] junee - 2017-04-29 23:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] morieris - 2017-04-29 23:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] mrs_don_draper - 2017-04-30 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 05:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
It's only happened once so I'm not sure if it's enough of a "thing" to qualify as a pet peeve, but years ago I was part of a comm that basically started to self-destruct. tl;dr short, they started deleting threads for no reason and making "jokes" when people asked what happened, and I later learned the admins didn't even want the forum anymore. Why not just hand it over to new people, instead of self-destructing? It left me with unpleasant memories of an otherwise pretty great site.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 22:51 (UTC) - Expand
skeletal_history: (Default)

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] skeletal_history 2017-04-29 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
People who tell other people to stop posting [whatever], instead of blocking the tag or unfollowing. I just can't deal with that level of shitheaded entitlement.

Like the other day, someone sent this to a blog I follow:

It is so great that you give so much attention to people’s questions. But could you please stop filling up the [pairing] tumblr with long essays? It is starting to look like a 13-year-old’s Live Journal from 2007. You and [other blog] are obviously dedicated members of the fandom, but you are not doing it any favors. I don’t know what happened to the tumblr. It used to be great and then started filling up with this stuff.

WTIF is wrong with this person?

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-29 23:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 03:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
People who bitch about "tagging your hate." Scrolling exists for a reason, assholes, and I'm talking about x topic that I've tagged. (And not usually with hate, just some occasional deserved criticism.)

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 01:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2017-04-30 02:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 04:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] soldatsasha - 2017-04-30 05:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
People who talk about how much less misogynistic young fandom is now.

Naw, you just replaced female character bashing with passive aggressive uwu female character is too pure and soft to want ??? teh gross ??? sexxorz??? She will stand in the corner and be perfect and an asexual lesbian mommy and not interfere with the sinful yaoiz I am going into detail about.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Idiotic fan theories. Like Black Male Character A wears glasses and has a Spanish surname, Black Male Character B also wears glasses and a has a Spanish surname, therefore they are totes father and son, doncha know.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-29 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
This is mostly Bioware specific, but applies to some other games as well. People getting all up in arms about choices you make in RPGs. "If you choose option A you're an oppressor who probably eats kittens in real life", "if you romance character B you support abuse and should be locked up", and so forth.

I am one of those weirdos who roleplay in their roleplaying games (crazy huh?) so when I pick an asshole option it's because I play my character as an asshole, not because I want to fap at the suffering of pixels (oddly enough, less vitriol gets thrown towards Sims players who delete pool ladders). But nope, for these people, making certain chioces will automatically mean you're the antichrist. In fact, it doesn't even need to be the asshole option, just the option they personally didn't pick.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] soldatsasha - 2017-04-30 05:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 10:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 19:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] mimi_sardinia - 2017-04-30 09:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 18:59 (UTC) - Expand
junee: (filia)

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] junee 2017-04-30 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
People not putting long fic chapters/essays behind a read more cut. Rude as hell.

People who tag their personal post with x character because they used a gif of that character in their post. Like, I'm glad your coffee was good, but what the fuck does that have to do with Loki?

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 00:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 01:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] junee - 2017-04-30 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] morieris - 2017-04-30 18:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-30 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
People who complain about not being able to find the kind of fic they want in a way that suggests they think it is somehow a problem with other people. "Why don't people write gen/my kinks/my OTP??" Um, because they don't feel like it? It's free online fanfic, not the WPA Writers Project or the BBC or some other tax/fee-supported thing. Fic authors do not have to satisfy everyone and no one has to defend why they aren't writing what you want, and it's not a question of skill.

Same with people being convinced there must be lots of the fic they want out there and it's the archive's fault they can't find it. I'm sure there's fic that gets catalogued improperly (which is the writer's fault), but if there were really that much of it, some of it would get through to you. I've been reading fanfic online since before ff.net existed, when it was fandom-specific archives and personal websites with no tagging systems or drop-down menus. I still found fic to read - not always fic with every damn check box satisfied, but I still had fic to read. Most likely, if you can't find the kind of fic you want, then there is very little of the fic you seek out there and you would not be satisfied even if you knew you had tracked down every last story in existence.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-30 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
There is nothing to be done about it cause its not just fandom, but it bums me out how skinny, conventionally attractive cosplayers obviously get more attention than others.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 11:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 16:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-04-30 04:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Fics where the author makes one half of their OTP ace, and the "happy ending" is that the other half decides that "true love doesn't need sex" and takes a vow of chastity so they can cuddle and bake cookies with their snookums for the rest of their lives. Coercing someone into changing their sexual orientation for you is not suddenly romantic because you're ace.

Re: fandom pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-04-30 20:10 (UTC) - Expand