Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-05-03 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #3773 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3773 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Notorious, Megan and Julia]
__________________________________________________
04.

[David Tennant in Broadchurch]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Paul Hollywood and Noel Fielding, Great British Bake Off]
__________________________________________________
06.

[The Americans]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 22 secrets from Secret Submission Post #540.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 01:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 01:36 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 04:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 06:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 01:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)Also, every one that I have accidentally read has been written terribly.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 01:19 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 01:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 03:31 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)there's lots of slightly more logical yet no less petty reasons for it. most of them are written in second person and I fucking hate second person more than almost anything in a piece of prose. my partner's reason is that they're the laziest form of Mary Sue fic - you can't even be arsed to make up a Mary Sue to self-insert, so you literally self-insert. add that to the overwhelming likelihood that it's going to be poorly-written anyway and...you get the gist.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 00:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 01:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 02:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 04:16 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)And as other anons said, they're so difficult to filter away.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 06:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)Never has "don't like, don't read" been more appropriate.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 02:57 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 00:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 12:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-03 23:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 01:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 00:10 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)However, reader/character is someone's sex fantasy in a way that's more explicitly so than smut between canon characters or with a named OC. It's kind of a turn off for me to not be able to ignore that. On top of that, character/reader is a style that invites me, the reader, to participate in the sex fantasy. Of course, unless I leave a comment, it's not like the author has any idea who I am or whether I read the fic, so I'm not really interacting with the author, but it's still just kinda weird.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-03 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)For me, it's more just mainly the fact that, from the couple fics of that sort I have looked at, the reader description will either have to be so vague because they're trying to make it where anyone can insert themselves, which kind of detracts from the story, I think, or they've got just enough specific details for the reader character to where I wonder why the author doesn't just turn them into a proper OC*. And then the (Y/N) aspect throws me out of the story, too. It's just jarring.
*(But then, of course, if the author did that, they'd get flak from people who don't like canon character/OC stories, too, so... Can't win either way, it seems.)
And on a general level, I think one reason those kinds of stories bother some people so much is because the canon already has so many characters one can use to write about/ship a character with/whatever, and they might be rather frustrated that some fans are ignoring exploring those characters and possible dynamics (platonic and non-platonic) in favor of some vague reader-insert.
That said, however, even though those kinds of fics aren't my thing in general, I'm not going to get bent out of shape if people write them. I just simply scroll past them and move on. And since AO3 has a way to filter out the types of stories you (general "you") don't like, then people who really can't stand those kinds of fics can just use that. Should solve the problem, I'd think.
And if anyone does have any examples of good character/reader fics, feel free to share them :). Always good to be reminded that any type of fic can work in the right hands.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 01:54 (UTC) - ExpandI guess some people are ardently against them.
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 12:00 am (UTC)(link)A little distance makes fiction better
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 12:00 am (UTC)(link)So it's not just that most insert fic is bad. It doesn't really stand a chance. There's not a lot of magic to be had when you've lost the best crutch.
Re: A little distance makes fiction better
Re: A little distance makes fiction better
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 01:22 (UTC) - ExpandF!S be like
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 12:15 am (UTC)(link)So yeah, I agree with this secret. Character/Reader stories are generally (in my view) a bit immature or childish. I'm not personally interested. But I think worse of the people who mock them mercilessly. Just avoid them, for pity's sake. And yes, even if they're annoying...they're not killing your puppies. Which you would probably fap too anyway.
anon be like
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 00:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: anon be like
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 00:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: anon be like
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 00:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: F!S be like
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 01:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: F!S be like
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-04 05:08 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 12:33 am (UTC)(link)I personally prefer stuff that has character descriptions and development rather than a place holder.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 12:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 06:39 am (UTC)(link)Inserting myself into the story? Oh fuck, NO. I'm here because I love the characters, and their story, and their relationship with each other. For me, imagining myself involved in their story in any way feels really intrusive and disruptive and off-putting. Even the thought of sitting down beside one of the characters on the bus and having a casual conversation with them for a few minutes gives me a strong "wongwrongwrong" feeling. I am not part of their world, and I don't belong in their world, and it feels disruptive and weird to even try to imagine myself there.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-04 08:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-05 12:35 am (UTC)(link)Also most writers lack the finess to pull off second person.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 06:17 am (UTC)(link)