case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-07-02 02:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #3833 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3833 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #549.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
in b4 "I'd never date someone who doesn't love reading!" from people who predominantly read PWP smut fics

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Considering nothing in the secret was about dating, what gave you the idea this would be a topic of conversation? And give me some actual proof if you are going to say "IT HAPpENNS ALL ThE tIME ON heRE!1!"

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
this is confusingly overly defensive because i didnt say that

if anything, all i implied was that many people who snobbily say "I would never date someone who doesn't like to read," read a shit ton of meaningless fluff or porn themselves which if you're denying, i'm gonna lol

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
What

Are you not aware people who say that exist and overlap hugely with pretentious people who are proud of themselves being A Reader unlike those Non Readers? Like, it's not a big leap that these are the same kinds of people OP and anon are talking about

Nobody said anything about anything happening all the time on here

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah thats what i was getting at, people who think they're intellectuals because they read but lol if they're reading in fandom what they're actually reading is bound to be mostly shipping and smut purely because well literally statistically that is most fic

which is perfectly FINE who cares if its mostly shipping and smut, but acting pretentious and better than others over "reading" when considering the material that makes up most of the reading is lolable

i guess i hit a nerve with anon

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

"Nobody said anything about anything happening all the time on here"

Does prefacing your comment with "in b4" no longer imply that you believe you're posting in the thread right before others respond in a predictable way?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
it means it expects at least one person to bring this up, not that 100 people immediately will

you are so defensive about this bro chillax

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm an entirely different anon. Not everyone who questions your behavior is being defensive. I'm not sure why you're trying to hard to start this wank.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-02 19:43 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I would put a large gap between something that says "in b4 wank" on like, a secret about social justice or sth and "IT HAPpENNS ALL ThE tIME ON heRE!1!"

I read it like anon expects the topic to be brought up? It didn't surprise me because I do recall a few responses in some Dating Dealbreakers threads where people did say they couldn't date someone who didn't read or have reading as a hobby and this secret reminded me of that, so it could be anon had the same thought

I'm not invested enough in this thread to go digging up links as proof, though

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Team no one, tbh.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Someone's defensive, lol.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd never date anyone who doesn't read PWP smut fics!!!!11!!

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I would, but they had to be on board with my reading of PWPs and like it too.

Actually, I don't think I'd be with someone who was actively against reading. We didn't have to like the same reads, but they'd have to be literate and enjoy a good discussion (on theirs or mine favorite reads).

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

Someone being actively against reading would be pretty extreme I think. Maybe someone old and tech illiterate? How would they use the internet?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I had a relationship with another girl who didn't like fiction. (She basically only enjoyed reading academic journals.) Since I basically live inside SFF stories, it really should have been a warning sign of how we weren't going to last.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Not necessarily. I read "everything" and hubby reads tomes on programming language and mathematics (plus politics and history when urged with something I know he'll like), and we've been together 27 years now. Works just fine. We actively engage in each others interests though, within reason.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL!

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
LMAOO

(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Why does that particular statement hit your buttons so hard?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
it doesn't, i am pointing out something that is funny to myself and apparently to others as well

if you are insinuating for some reason that i personally do not like to read and am offended by people saying that or something, lol, we are on fandomsecrets and i read fic all the time, so idk, what a weird serious way to take this

(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Everyone is just defensive or angry or too serious, right?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
no

just the one anon that took my statement as quote: "IT HAPpENNS ALL ThE tIME ON heRE!1!"

instead of a joke

lol

(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
oh and i guess this anon too

IF thats what they are insinuating which i dont know if they are or not. thats... why i said if. you know

(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 02:48 am (UTC)(link)
I vastly prefer audiovisual media to writing. I know people who are smug avid readers but are garbage when it come to interpret visual cues.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-03 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
Same, it feels more natural to me.