Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-07-28 07:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #3859 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3859 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

[Twin Peaks Season 3]
__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03. http://i.imgur.com/36jpHpw.jpg
[Marco Polo, warning for (TV) nudity/sex]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05. [WARNING for discussion of self-harm]

[American Gods (Starz)]
__________________________________________________
06. [WARNING for discussion of incest]

__________________________________________________
07. [WARNING for discussion of abuse, sexual assault]

(Dumbing of Age, Billie and Ruth)
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #551.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
Also they feel they have to state it as if it's an obvious point that "everybody" agrees on that does not even need to be discussed.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 04:54 am (UTC)(link)Essentially my point. Tumblr culture seems to demand of its users a kind of "Reblog if .... and you're a terrible person if you don't" orthodoxy, and this extends in particular to the point I raised in my secret.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:15 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 02:44 am (UTC)(link)It's not - speaking in the interests of people learning to be kinder - a term I find thoroughly useful. Because I don't think the people who are the worst, the ones that sound like they wandered out of 1984, quite see it that way.
Because, well, I've been that angry before? (Christ, I was a stressed out teen and young adult.) And when I was like that, that judgemental, spiralling into the anger like a bad case of depression and as short-sighted - I didn't think of it as using in-group terms or language policing. I was just that angry, that every little detail was something I zeroed in on and got angrier by, every action people took I just naturally assumed was done in the worst possible faith. And someone telling me I was doing this to fit in with a peer group would just have made me angrier, because I would not have considered it true - it would just have felt like another attack. And it wouldn't have encouraged me to stop.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 02:53 am (UTC)(link)this is demonstrably not the case
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:17 am (UTC)(link)It's essentially used to explain any time anyone evinces concern for someone who doesn't belong to their socioeconomic and racial subgroup
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 12:18 am (UTC)(link)In this case, they're saying most of the Purity Brigade doesn't actually care about real life victims of incest, they just want to sound all moral by loudly denouncing ships they find icky.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 04:03 am (UTC)(link)Because I'm not a right-wing internet troll (and not so dumb as to blindly use their monikers), I'm with you on going WTF about the term as such.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-29 06:30 pm (UTC)(link)no subject