[ SECRET POST #3942 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3942 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #564.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

De minimis non curat lex. Obviously using it in the context of a fandomsecret isn't a big deal because practically no one sees it and no one's really benefiting from it and it's a harmless social usage. But, from a formal point of view, doing so is infringing on the rights of the image creator to control how their image is used. And while it's not a big deal for you or me to do it, it bothers me a little when you have really popular accounts dedicated to aggregating content ripping off smaller creators - which is the context that I'm really concerned with here. I'm not really trying to say that using images is always wrong or anything like that, and there are a lot of cases where it's not a big deal at all - it depends a lot on context.

Also, I would say that if you're using work from a specific creator, even on fandom!secrets, it's certainly polite to credit the creator of the image if possible, and I've seen people do so. Also, to be clear, I'm not OP, and the only comments that I've made ITT are in this subthread. And the initial point that I came into the thread to make was just that reposting a person's art without attribution is different from making fanart.

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, you're moving goalposts.

First using the images is thievery. Then it's either not thievery and no big deal or thievery that is somehow not wrong, depending on how minor it is?

I agree that popular accounts dedicated to ripping off smaller creators are thieves. But they are thieves because they are almost always monetized in some shape or form, or are doing it for "payment" of hits to their site and personal popularity and influence, or are - officially or secretly - working for the site itself to generate traffic, so they are thieves profiting off of other people's work without permission, by both my standards are yours.

But, without some sort of huge leap of logic to try and accommodate your extreme scenario, that's not something I would call merely some fans "reposting fanart without credit."

[(Anonymous)]

Fair enough.