Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-10-19 06:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #3942 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3942 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #564.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-19 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)First using the images is thievery. Then it's either not thievery and no big deal or thievery that is somehow not wrong, depending on how minor it is?
I agree that popular accounts dedicated to ripping off smaller creators are thieves. But they are thieves because they are almost always monetized in some shape or form, or are doing it for "payment" of hits to their site and personal popularity and influence, or are - officially or secretly - working for the site itself to generate traffic, so they are thieves profiting off of other people's work without permission, by both my standards are yours.
But, without some sort of huge leap of logic to try and accommodate your extreme scenario, that's not something I would call merely some fans "reposting fanart without credit."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-19 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)