Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-10-27 06:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #3950 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3950 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[The CW's Dynasty, 2017]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05. [SPOILERS for Blue Reflection]

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Great British Bake Off series 8, Pastry week]

__________________________________________________
07. [WARNING for underage]

__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for possible discussion of sexual harassment? (and actual serial killer necrophiliacs)]

[Netflix Mindhunter]
__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for possible discussion of sexual assault/abuse]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for possible discussion of sexual assault/abuse]

__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for possible discussion of abuse]

[Bates Motel]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #565.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: What fictional character types do you hate?
"This is not a person. This is a stock character. It’s giving the protagonist the equivalent of a cuddly toy bear, except that this cuddly toy bear also can talk back and looks human and is a most willing fuck."
(I also wonder what you'd make of a certain character in The Golden Oecumene, unnamed due to spoilers. Long story short, she was created to be another character's perfect love interest, but in the most backhanded and vengeful way possible, as a final insult from her creator before leaving forever. Her existence is literally a sick joke.)
Re: What fictional character types do you hate?
(Anonymous) 2017-10-28 02:56 am (UTC)(link)That post was a good read, thanks!
I'm unfamiliar with that canon you mention, but just based on your description, I don't think I'd be particularly annoyed by that character. The problem with designated love interests for me is that they don't enrich the story, they're flat non-characters who are just there as a reward for the protagonist or because the author feels obliged to include some kind of romance. It cheapens the narrative, brings the whole story down. If it's a plot point that someone is just a blandly perfect LI, then they're not just a blandly perfect LI. There's potential for them to get an actual storyline and actual character development, which would 1) actually enrich the story and 2) make them something resembling a fully realized character.