Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-10-30 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #3953 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3953 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #566.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
First of all, a lot of gay and bi men (broadly defined) are not down with being groped or snogged by strangers without permission, especially in a professional context with implied quid pro quo going on. Not everyone is down with the lack of boundaries in club culture either.
Second, we were side-eying chickenhawks back in the 80s and 90s when Rapp was sexually assaulted by Spacey (allegedly just to cover legal asses, not that I think that Spacey's PR people are in a position to blacklist all of this chatter.) It just was impossible to have a serious conversation about that without all the consequences of outing everyone involved. But no, it was not appropriate for Spacey to hit on Rapp at age 14.
My tiny bit of salt is that everyone is treating Rapp and Crews as credible today after decades of gaslighting and JAQing ("just asking questions") attempts by men (broadly defined) to discuss sexual assault and sexual abuse? Yeah, I think straight women are not the experts there.
Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
(Anonymous) 2017-10-30 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)Can you expand on this? Not disagreeing - I'm honestly not understanding what you're driving at here
Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 12:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 12:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 12:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 01:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 01:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
These days, it's complicated. I've always been "questioning" since I was a young adult, and at 45, the prospect of spending the rest of my life in that closet is starting to create some serious problems. But for the sake of this discussion, I think I'm familiar with what Rapp went through as a queer survivor.
Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 01:57 am (UTC)(link)I guess this is what one has to ask, these days: do you have XX or XY chromosomes?
Re: This twitter thread (LGBT and consent)
EDIT: And I don't know whether to laugh or cry at the notion that I'm a transmasculine person catfishing as a feminine queer AMAB person under this handle for over 20-odd years. Either way, I'm not going to cough up dubious "proof of gender" for an anon.
EDIT2: Although I admit, JAQing off by repeatedly questioning my gender as a child and young adult when I was sexually assaulted is a novel variation on the theme.