[ SECRET POST #3970 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3970 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #568.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Entertainment News!

[(Anonymous)]

SHARE IT!

Poor Justice League only got a 36% on Rottentomatoes

[(Anonymous)]

Apparently the CGI is HORRIBLE. I've seen a screenshot of Henry Cavill's face from where they had to CGI out his mustache and it is bad. I've also seen a supposed clip from one scene. But I can't believe it is real because of how bad it is.

Re: Poor Justice League only got a 36% on Rottentomatoes

[morieris]

omg where is the image??? that's the only reason I'm remotely interested in this movie.

Re: Poor Justice League only got a 36% on Rottentomatoes

[kaijinscendre]

Thankfully I sent those same links to my sis earlier.

Superman face: https://i.imgur.com/331a1nx.png
Clip (hosted on 4chan): http://i.4cdn.org/co/1510768437095.webm

Re: Poor Justice League only got a 36% on Rottentomatoes

[(Anonymous)]

Looking forward to DC fans getting all salty and claiming there's a conspiracy against them

again

Re: Poor Justice League only got a 36% on Rottentomatoes

[(Anonymous)]

So? Who cares what some stupid critic site rated a film at? Love it, if you want to love it. I know I plan to.

Re: Poor Justice League only got a 36% on Rottentomatoes

[(Anonymous)]

Well, Rotten Tomatoes is a critic aggregate site, which means that they take a lot of the critics reviews to give a movies its rating. But of the reason Rotten Tomatoes was significant is that they were holding the rating back and they are partially owned by Warner Brothers. Of course, it could go up as more critics review. Or it could go down. On the other hand, the audience seems to have liked it.

Re: Poor Justice League only got a 36% on Rottentomatoes

[(Anonymous)]

If it helps, this and another movie were briefly mentioned on NPR this morning and the woman reviewing them liked Justice League (was surprised how much she liked it) but said it was just a fun action movie with "no nutritional value."

Why is DC having a hard time making good movies now? Did they back themselves into a weird corner with Batman vs. Superpan? (I never saw that.) Maybe they should just do Wonderwoman movies and TV for a while.

Also, did Cavill have a "no mustache shaving" clause in his contract or what? It's not like hiding a tattoo or an injury or a pregnancy. Just shave, dude. It will grow back.

Rampage Trailer

[(Anonymous)]

Will this be the BEST VIDEO GAME MOVIE EVER??? Only time will tell.

https://youtu.be/coOKvrsmQiI

Re: Rampage Trailer

[morieris]

I'm surprised it doesn't look that bad.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

[(Anonymous)]

They released a photo with all the characters!

Depp still exists. :( https://imgur.com/gallery/zHTVB

Re: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

[(Anonymous)]

I am so done with Johnny Depp being in movies tbh

Re: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

[(Anonymous)]

I hear ya, friend! Why couldn't they have kept Colin Farrell? OTOH, Johnny Depp being off-putting may intensify the villainy of Grindelwald. But still... Colin Farrell... :'(

Re: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

[(Anonymous)]

Fuck off.

Re: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

[(Anonymous)]

Same.

Re: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

[comma_chameleon]

Fuck yeaaaaaah, Jude Law as baby!Dumbles? +1

Aw, I like Johnny's stylings.

And Ezra looks pretty... as always. Actually, everyone does. I love the costuming.

Re: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

[kaijinscendre]

How can they bring back Ezra Miller but not my boy Colin Farell?

Re: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

[morieris]

^^^

Re: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

[ketita]

Ugh. I mean in addition to what he did, I can't get over how much I hate Grindelwald's look. He's supposed to be attractive and charming! wtf is this bullshit?
It's such terrible casting, imo. I'm so disappointed.

Deadpool 2 Teaser

[(Anonymous)]

https://youtu.be/2-5Wv9UGkN8

Re: Deadpool 2 Teaser

[otakugal15]

THAT TEASER IS FUCKING GOLD

Re: Deadpool 2 Teaser

[(Anonymous)]

I hate deadpool.

A Quiet Place (a horror movie)

[(Anonymous)]

https://youtu.be/p9wE8dyzEJE

I think it looks good if they can explain why these people just don't move.

Re: A Quiet Place (a horror movie)

[comma_chameleon]

That looks awesome. I honestly don't even care if they explain why they can't move.

Re: A Quiet Place (a horror movie)

[morieris]

I've seen so many positive things about this trailer so i'm not watching it. I want to be surprised!


But I thought they couldn't move because ~something might get them. Unless you meant something more specific than that, sorry .-.