[ SECRET POST #3993 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3993 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 57 secrets from Secret Submission Post #572.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[ibbity]

So...on your planet, only straight people can be described by a word that means exactly "attracted to only one sex"? Because...describing people who are only attracted to one sex, while specifying that that sex is their own, with a term which means specifically "attracted to only one sex," and qualifying that term with the specification that that sex is their own, is...homophobic? Because on your planet, describing someone as being attracted exclusively to their own sex, in terminology that means exactly that and no more, somehow translates to "Gay people are literally exactly the same as straight people and also invalid?" Boy, I'd hate to study linguistics on that planet.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

It's impressive that you've managed to write this post while seemingly not knowing how to read. Well done.

Because...describing people who are only attracted to one sex, while specifying that that sex is their own, with a term which means specifically "attracted to only one sex," and qualifying that term with the specification that that sex is their own, is...homophobic?

Yeah, dog, it fucking is, because you have the word "gay" to describe ~monosexual~ gay people and yet you're still insistent on slamming in another term that just happens to imply that straight and gay people form a cogent social category based on both being attracted to only one gender.

[(Anonymous)]

SA

And I'm going to leave now because I can tell already that you don't give a shit about whether you're being homophobic or not and you're just going to dig in further about how lesbians are The Worst People Ever and gay people should just shut the fuck up.

[(Anonymous)]

/hugs

idk if you'll read this because you just said you're leaving but just in case you do come back, just want you to know that I understand what you're saying and i support it and thanks.

[ibbity]

I mean, you're free to invent imaginary meanings for what I said if you want to. No one's stopping you from doing so, or from flouncing because you're mad about the imaginary meanings you choose to impose on what I said. I don't recall saying that lesbians are evil or that gay people "should just shut up," but hey, the imagination is a wonderful thing. You are, however, not really allowed to invalidate the actual, lived issues of erasure or phobia that actual real people have experienced on the basis that you prefer to imagine that calling out those issues is the real phobia.

[(Anonymous)]

You are, however, not really allowed to invalidate the actual, lived issues of erasure or phobia that actual real people have experienced on the basis that you prefer to imagine that calling out those issues is the real phobia.

Nobody's telling you that the issues aren't real or that it's not real biphobia. They're just telling you not to use homophobic terminology while talking about it. I'm not sure why you're having such a hard time understanding this. The only person trying to invalidate the actual, lived issues of erasure or phobia here is you.

[(Anonymous)]

No, you're just pulling the "racist uncle" bullshit. You know, the "well I'm sure there's some nice black folks out there, but in my experience there's sure a whole lot of 'em bein' thugs." Like, you're absolutely ascribing a terrible, vilifying trait to lesbians because some girls were assholes to you.

It wouldn't be very nice of me, for instance, to say that in my experience, bi girls are cheating dramahounds, because while that is actually true for me as a lesbian (so don't talk shit about "invalidation" here), it was just those particular girls. Their being bi is an aside. But I could certainly use it the way you're using your ~lived experience~ and perpetuate further stereotypes against bisexuals. I won't, because I'm not an asshole, but I could.

[(Anonymous)]

So...on your planet[...]

Seconding this whole comment, and basically everything you're saying in this thread. Sorry you're having to deal with people's unwarranted hostility. :(