case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-02-07 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #4053 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4053 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-08 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
I agree, but I also think there's a decidedly insidious nuance to JKR/Fantastic Beasts 2's attitude to this. WW and Thor as specific examples - the sexuality of the characters was 'word of God', outside of the film's canon, or subtext endorsed by cast and crew. It was never a selling point and not something the creators proudly toted out as a way of garnering... publicity, or 'diversity points', something.

I don't know, it just feels different to me, comparing subtext vs something that the creator loudly and vocally insisted was a thing, and then whoops, as soon as it's a big film for an international market, somewhat cowardly backtracking on again.

+1

(Anonymous) 2018-02-08 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
ia

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2018-02-08 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know, WW and Valkyrie are among the most notable bi women from the big two comics publishers. Deadpool as well is widely acknowledged to be pansexual in comics, but that ended up interpreted through a number of jokes and a credits scene. I think MacKinnon is on the record as packing as much lesbian coding as she could get away with into Holtzman but the studio put brakes on that. It's enough of a pattern to note that there's a pretty clear double-standard between print and cinema going on.

I read Rowling's tweets (including the Depp one) as likely supporting a studio or distributor mandate.