[ SECRET POST #4053 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4053 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But even if it happens, some self-righteous asshole will mount their high horse and piss all over it no matter how it's done.

Ergo, they shouldn't do it?

Which is where I'm struggling to see the point in even trying to please people anymore. Way I see it, people don't even deserve to be pleased.

Well, first of all, I don't see why it even needs to be about pleasing people. It's also about doing the right thing. Second, even setting that aside, this still seems kind of over-the-top. Some people won't be pleased, therefore fuck everybody?

Like, yeah, some people will disagree, like they do about literally everything that's ever happened in the entire history of the world. Why would you expect something to be universally beloved? Nothing, ever, in the history of the world, has been universally beloved. There has been some equivalent of a person in the fandom willing to piss all over it for literally everything in history. I don't think that's a reasonable expectation.

[(Anonymous)]

Ergo, they shouldn't do it?

Didn't say that. Didn't even imply it. Don't put words in my mouth.

It's also about doing the right thing.

This is true. But here's the thing: how would they do it? How does one simply be gay to the satisfaction of an audience looking to a gay character to be gay? I think that's a legitimate question. What is "good" representation of a gay character? What is a "good" portrayal? And how is it relevant to the story?

You're the one choosing to believe that I think they shouldn't even try, which I never said. I did ask why should they bother trying to please people, though, and I stand by that.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

What is the meaningful difference between not trying to explicitly represent a gay character, and not trying to please people who want to see a gay character represented?

[(Anonymous)]

People have standards about how gay people are represented. And I'm struggling to see how they can bring it up while staying true to Dumbledore's character and the narrative. I'm not saying they shouldn't try, though. I just need a hand seeing how.

I'm struggling to see how they can work his sexual orientation into the narrative, because I, as well as many other folks, saw zero indication one way or the other in Books 1-7, and the revelation of Dumbledore's sexual orientation was purely a "word of God" moment for some of us. That's the source material I'm working with, not any supplementary material. Does that make sense?